Scientists espouse that sound is a phenomenon that is perceived after the disruption of a fluid medium, which is mostly air. The disturbance of air, therefore, causes sound. However, the most significant question is whether that sound exists when materialism or idealism ideas, coupled with other conditions, are considered.
Based on realism, it would be right to conclude that if a tree falls in a forest where there is no one to perceive the fall, neither the sound that results, then there is no sound. The reality that the pressure field is disturbs, the presence of vibrations, and hence sound witnessed are all influenced by one’s thoughts. Auditory perception is instrumental in ensuring a sound is perceived. Hence, the presence of sensory organs in a particular environment influences the thoughts of perception of particular stimuli. Unless there is someone to hear the sound, there would be no proof that the sound exists. This can best be exemplified by the presence of a deaf person in a given surrounding. To the person in question, regardless of loud a sound present is, in their world, there is no sound because they cannot perceive through their auditory senses.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
In using subjective idealism, it would be right to conclude that the sound would only exist if a person is present. This is because Berkeley stipulates that it is impossible to distinguish reality from perception. The philosopher emphasizes that the essence of objects can only be understood through an individual’s senses. Berkeley refutes the existence of a mind-independent world. It is hard to make assumptions about an unobserved world because there is no evidence about it. In the unobserved world, the most fundamental question to ask is what tree is being referenced. If in reality, it is impossible to tell about the particular tree, then sound does not exist when it falls because it the cause of the sound itself is not certain.
