Ethics are set of principles that are practiced by a group of people. Organizations tend to set some codes of conduct that regulates the interaction of the employees to the rest of the environment. In most cases ethics are regarded as guiding morals associated with a certain organization or a group of people (Peters, 2015). Generally, ethics always define what is right or wrong for a particular group of individuals. The main purpose of this paper is to discuss the potential harms of an adolescent on a death of a pet and also discuss the best ways of obtaining consents of adolescents. Secondly, this paper also tackles relationship between college professors’ age and their intellectual ability.
The potential harm inflicted on adolescents when asked about death of their pets is always caused by the remembrance of their past relations (Walder et al , 2014) . According to Walder et al , (2014), an overwhelmed child who tends to function in an abnormal routine are advised to visit adolescent psychiatrist or any other qualified psychological experts. Parents are always encouraged to talk and share feelings with their children whenever pets are sick or die. When they do so, the children grow without keeping strong relation with dead pets. This may lead to upsetting of ideas and events, also makes the adolescent to remember all the painful losses.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Adolescent Life Change Event Scale (ALCES) is the measure of change in a life event of an adolescent ( Walder et al , 2014) . Therefore, obtaining the consent of the adolescents from their parents is the best idea to get their consent. Most children change their life as they attain adolescent, this tends to affect their ethics therefore determining their consent by using ALCES will not favor them.
However, in the study of age-related changes and intellectual performance, participants failed to actively participate due to the threatening nature of the title. Consequently, the researchers decided to change the title to age-related changes across the lifespan to make it appealing to the clients. In so doing there was an immersive increase in number of participants. It was ethical to change the title since the aim of the researchers was to contact many participants. The researchers maintained the goals of the study. However, since participants were apprehensive due to the threatening title, therefore, changing it was the only way to encourage participants.
Participants who agreed to be in the study after changing of the title would be surprised to find out that they have participated in whatever they were avoiding. Since within the first slot the contacted participants showed a low turnout. The title aimed at researching at the developments and losses in aging (Cavanaugh & Fields, 2018) . Cavanaugh et al , (2018) maintains that adult development and aging starts from adolescence to adulthood. However, after the title was changed the participants found out that it was the same content they were avoiding.
Professors were apprehensive about age-related changes and intellectual performance because the title looked threatening since the test would expose their individual weaknesses. Consequently, the changed title named seemed appealing irrespective of what was the general goal of the study.
Therefore, ethical conduct is understood to be what is perceived morally right or wrong. It is a subject of discussion from different views and by who is judging. Hence, from the above scenarios one can argue as either scenario is right or wrong based on their understanding of the subject matter.
References
Cavanaugh, J. C., & Blanchard-Fields, F. (2018). Adult development and aging . Cengage Learning.
Peters, R. S. (2015). Ethics and Education (Routledge Revivals) . Routledge
Steinberg, L. (2014). Age of opportunity: Lessons from the new science of adolescence . Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Walder, D. J., Faraone, S. V., Glatt, S. J., Tsuang, M. T., & Seidman, L. J. (2014). Genetic liability, prenatal health, stress and family environment: risk factors in the Harvard Adolescent Family High Risk for schizophrenia study. Schizophrenia research , 157 (1-3), 142-148.
