To some extent, there is an overlap between Compstat and community policing models; hence, a couple of similarities. On the other hand, however, there are also notable differences that set the two apart. First of all, Compstat significantly disregards patrol officers but places the burden of crime reduction on command staff and supervisors. On the other hand, however, community policing emphasizes decision making at the street level, hence, giving lower-ranked police a significant obligation of reducing crime. Closely related to this, while Compstat mainly forces supervisors and commanders to pursue different means to ensure crime reduction, community policing models look at amicable ways to ensure that not only police but also community members are part of crime reduction efforts ( Willis et al ., 2003).
One advantage that can be harnessed while implementing Compstat is using data collected in better and informed decision making. One disadvantage, however, is that officials can present less criminal data to insinuate a reduction in crime. This will, in turn, hamper efforts related to crime reduction as they will not be scaled to the necessary level. Similarly, there are disadvantages and advantages associated with community policing law enforcement. One fundamental advantage is it encourages collaboration between the community and the police, hence, better problem-saving. At the same time, it reduces fear among community members because of the level of friendship between the community and law enforcement personnel. It is, however, disadvantageous because unless a rapport is developed between the police and the community members, related objectives will not be achieved ( Willis et al ., 2010)
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Community policing is the best law enforcement technique. One of the reasons behind the choice is that its structure encourages an in-depth understanding of community needs; hence, solutions to the problems are likely to be more effective ( Willis et al ., 2010). At the same time, unlike Compstat which largely limits citizen’s liberty, community policing reinforces it by ensuring community members are also instrumental in crime prevention. Moreover, it presents a true definition of democracy. It is, therefore, more effective because of the emphasis it puts on community contribution towards its success.
References
Willis, J., Mastrofski, S., & Weisburd, D. (2003). NCJRS Abstract - National Criminal Justice Reference Service . Ncjrs.gov. Retrieved 10 May 2020, from https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=241006 .
Willis, J. J., Mastrofski, S. D., & Rinehart Kochel, T. (2010). Recommendations for integrating Compstat and community policing. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice , 4 (2), 182-193.
