Archeology as a field has some peculiarities because unlike sciences, because there’s no reversal of excavation. Some pros and cons come with digging an archeological site. The cons include the fact that digging an archeological site is destructive since it involves removal of layers that cannot be put back after that. Secondly, digging up an archeological site is a rigorous activity that requires identification of the layers and the deposits, excavation and lastly documentation.
On the other hand, the pros of digging an archeological site include pulling in tourists who would revitalize the Roman Villa area. Also, the site can be used for study purposes for students practical training whereby they would be equipped with necessary skills regarding the systems and techniques employed in an archeological site. Lastly, it is the only way to make sense of history.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Therefore, the Roman Villa archeological site should not be dug because of the dangers that come with the undertaking. Firstly, it is a dangerous place that could be marred with unexploded shells that could be lethal and this would threatens the personal safety of the archeologists. Also, the rigorous digging activity may require digging out tunnels that may contain the personal belongings as well as human remains which compound the issues that archeologists would be confronted with. Additionally, the minefields have been raising ethical concerns about how the past remains that are excavated should be treated. This is because many times there is interference by the indigenous people who claim the custody of the excavated material and being from a variety of ethnicities and faiths they have been preferring to handle the remains differently. Therefore, due to the above complexities, the Roman Villa should not be dug.
