My perception is that there exists a relationship between politics, policy, and science that serves to contradict the mythical norms. The majority believe that science and politics are separate variables where each is independent of the other. However, it is not true. For instance, in some cases, science is applied to formulate policies for practice. Through knowledge from science, members grasp successful nursing or medical practices, comprehend cost control strategies, impacts of initiatives and strategies to improve current standards. The scientific studies are greatly advantageous to general health and security for inhabitants of a nation.
The relationship between science, policy, and politics resides in research funding. The scientists have to compete to have their proposals accepted and funded. They have to impress and impact the stakeholders to surpass their competitors which now bring in the political aspect. Politics refers to the process where one influences the allocation of scarce resources. Science, on the other hand, pertains to the collection, dissemination of information to explain the current state of being and offer comprehension on the reason why phenomena exist as it does.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The mythical approach to the relationship between the two contradicted is the correlation belief. Science was taken asa separate independent variable from politics where each existed on its own. I disregard this belief as one variable cannot exist without the other. Stakeholders enumerating the politics-science relationship include government advisory boards, lobbyists, government agencies, universities, and political ideologists. All these parties come in to fund and offer their contribution in propelling the research which later is utilized in policy formulation. Apart from policy formulation, the science is utilized in generating political agendas, business developments, innovation, research furtherance, and education.
