The governor, county executives, and mayors have specific roles that assist in ensuring state affairs run smoothly. These roles are stipulated in the constitution and take effect upon election. The main function of the governor in literal meaning would be to direct the political debate and the speed at which it moves. Governors of each state hence pick up an active role in the creation and implementation of state laws that apply to each state. That specific role is synonymous to both the county executives and the mayors alike. Each governor is given the mandate to pick their desired style of management and hence get to employ their staff. They are also obligated to nominate officials to the county executive branch (“National Research Council,” 2013).
The appointment is important since one of their major roles is approving the budget brought forth to them. The budget, on the other hand, is established by the county executives who manage the county offices. So, the governor appoints the county executive, who manages the county offices by working cooperatively with county departments to establish an annual budget which the governor approves (Bozeman, 1993). The mayor holds an important position in that he forms a committee that debates on the matters concerning local communities. Thus, they can hold the county executives accountable when they do not accomplish their duty. Hence the government works for hand in hand to ensure that all the goals have been realized within the governor’s tenure (Bozeman, 1993).
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Some impediments to the success of the county government would include legal limitations either in structure or verticality of authority, single department projects rather than projects that cover cross departments. Also, there is favor of short term projects to long term agendas. More so, there is a lack of access to a basic necessity, such as a research center for data and information. Moreover, there is a lack of a county sustainability policy hence the shortage of institutionalized practices and process that can build cohesion and linkage between the jurisdictions. Another inevitable challenge that affects the jurisdictions is the dispersed form of authority found in the government; this means that different agencies of the government can only do what they have been authorized to do. Therefore, the county executives are generally limited in their actions (Bozeman, 1993). Also, funding in the government is only limited to specific appropriated activities; hence funding is on agency basis needs. It means that only if an agency is authorized to do a specific thing, only can they be funded.
Some of the mechanisms that can be used for resolution of these issues include litigation, mediation, and negotiation (Neslund, 2019). In litigation, the government can use the court system to amend certain policies that seem to cause red tape problems. Hence the county executives have the means to access more power or do away with certain restrictions that can barre their working ability. On the other hand, mediation in government, especially in county governments, can undertake the process in cases of conflicts. A mediator can be appointed by the state senate to deal with issues regarding different agencies (Neslund, 2019). Mayors in their local communities may face issues in terms of funding and so can employ the use of a mediator in their committee to settle the issue with the county executives. Lastly, negotiations are almost similar to mediation and litigation but do not involve the use of a third party. All the agencies can have amicable negotiations regarding powers, and allocation of funds to ensure that they run smoothly. Politics is mainly conflictual, and there are bound to many issues among the different agencies. However, there are always amicable ways to resolve conflicts and ensure success (Neslund, 2019).
References
Bozeman, B. (1993). A Theory of Government "Red Tape". Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 3 (3), 273-303. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1181785
National Research Council. (2013). Sustainability for the nation: Resource connections and governance linkages . National Academies Press.
Neslund, N. (2019). Retrieved 9 September 2019, from https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1193&context=jdr
