Officer’s Wolf use of deadly force on Hansel Hunterson did not meet the set standards and, hence, the officer was not justified to use live bullets on Hansel. The standard demands that deadly force should only be used when the officer confirms he is in danger. The officer in this case did not wait to confirm what it was Hansel was reaching for in his pockets. The lawsuit filed by the parents against Officer Wolf is called a litigation. The requirements for this is that the plaintiff should provide sufficient evidence to get the case started and put the defendant on trial. In my opinion, the case filed by the parents will be successful if the judges will be fairly look at the case closely.
The grand jury proceeding was not conducted in the right manner. It was organized secretly by the local District Attorney, Lisa Barnes, and Officer Wolf was not notified of the procedure not the existence of the jury. The law requires that both the plaintiff and the defendant are made aware all proceedings related to their cases. They should also be involved in the proceeding through their lawyers.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
According to the case brief, the officer was surely to be found guilty of manslaughter. The reversal of the indictment by the judge was not proper. It was based on the rivalry that the judge had with District Attorney Barnes. The indifferences between the two law experts should not have influenced the case.
The arrest/conviction of Lydia Shaw was done in a proper way. It was just a case of the lady being at the wrong place at the wrong time. The search/seizure procedure done by the police did not violate any laws and, hence, the procedure leading to the arrest can be deemed to be proper (Creamer, 1980) .
Reference
Creamer, J. S. (1980). The law of arrest, search, and seizure (p. 56). Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
