Terrorism is absolutely wrong and cannot be justified in any course of action. The deliberate use of lethal violence to terrorize innocent people for the sake of intimidating others is not justified no matter the circumstances. Such actions prove to be extremely hard to justify. Over the years the definition of terrorism has been based on the identity of the individuals perpetuating the violence but fail to include state terrorism ( Primoratz, 2013 ). Although the common moral view of many scholars is biased on the violent aspect but fails to see what terrorism prevents or stops in the society. When terrorism is judged solely on consequences, and the consequences are good; then terrorism may be morally justifiable.
Primoratz (2013) argues w hen there is a strong reason to believe that terrorism is the only way to stop a disaster and retreating a wide range of its costs. Terrorism in this case of moral disaster can be used to get rid of a huge threat, by eliminating an entire people. By this, it does not mean that terrorism is not wrong, because it involves the violation of basic rights and an uncivilized injustice.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
During the World War II the deliberate attacks on civilian cities and ending hundreds of lives cannot be justified. It’s believed that the bombing of the civilians led to the end of the war. This is the utilitarian approach of justifying terrorism. The war at the time of the bombing was at its last throes, according to many military authorities it was an unnecessary move. The deliberate attacks were mostly based on showing might a power more than ending the war.
When people start accepting that by doing crime we tend to save lives then most of the crimes that are committed by many nowadays are not crimes at all if they are based on saving lives. Terrorism is utterly wrong and cannot be justified no matter the course of action.
References
Primoratz, I. (2013, April 26 ). Terrorism is almost always morally unjustified, but it may be justified as the only way of preventing a “moral disaster”. Retrieved from < http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2013/04/29/terrorism-moral-disaster-justified-igor-primoratz-philosophy/ >
