Although manufacturing Meth was the primary source of income for James, it was an inherently dangerous activity. From the testimony provide by James in the court of law, it was evident that she knew all the potential risks associated with "cooking" Meth (74 Cal. Rptr.2d 7, 1998). At some point, she indicated that she used to cook the Meth in an enclosed space to contain the fire in an accident.
The United States law prescribes that for a court of law to determine whether a felony committed was inherently dangerous; it must conduct a thorough assessment of the general offense and the various aspects that motivated it. However, the defendant's specific code of conduct does not apply in this case. According to the law, an inherently dangerous felony is one that a person cannot commit without the chance that another part may succumb due to the felony. James' activities proved to be dangerous because manufacturing Meth involves the use of highly volatile chemicals. The chemicals are highly flammable regardless of the measures established to contain any impending catastrophe. Her decision to use her mobile home to manufacture the chemical posed a substantial risk to her children. Therefore, in this case, the court's ruling is affirmed.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Reference
People v. James: 74 Cal. Rptr.2d 7 (1998)
