After reading the article, I note that the question of whether virtue is teachable is much different and narrower than whether virtue is learnable. Plato is accurate when he reckons that virtue is not teachable. I think that we have all met or heard about people who recite virtues as be honest, be truthful, and many more but find it difficult to put them into action. Hence, virtues cannot be taught on any platform. Being virtuous is similar to possessing an exceptional talent and ability in singing, which is instinctual to some extent. Thus, for instance, to know when to feed a baby when it needs food is a matter of intuition or judgment. Similarly, knowing when to help a friend when he or she needs it is a matter of instinct and/or judgment.
Hence, the above argument implies that virtue may not be teachable; this is not mean that virtue is not learnable. Plato’s statement is consistent with the perception that virtue is inborn or innate. Plato’s suggestions are true to some degree. Some people are born with an exceptional ability to be compassionate and love other people. On the other hand, some people seem to have been born with very little or no moral sense of right and wrong. However, this implies that the foundation of virtue is inborn and innate, not that it can be learned. A person that was born compassionate can easily learn respect, love, patience, and many other values. Contrastingly, a person that was born without compassion will find it difficult to learn other virtues, including being merciful. In some way, people believe that they can be preached to become virtuous but still fail in practicing it.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
