For the parties interested in studying the area of criminal justice, they usually have the opportunity of utilizing a variety of research approaches they deem would be appropriate to allow them meet their research goals. In the event of quantitative studies, they have been broadly utilized when it comes to measuring the reality of criminal justice. For instance, the concepts used here usually serve as nonconcrete tags accorded numerical values on reality, hence leading them to emerge as variables. The variables are usually studied with the goal of evaluating the co-variation, relation patterns, as well as the existing cause and effect relationship. Quantitative research approaches utilize one or more dependent as well as independent variables (Jones, 2017) . Nonetheless, even though quantitative research approaches have been adopted in the criminal justice environment, therefore, the paper discusses major arguments against utilizing quantitative studies, including surveys and experiments in the field.
In the case of surveys, the major argument against their use in criminal justice setting emanates from their inflexible design. It is not possible to change the survey that researcher utilized from the start together with the means of administering it during the entire data gathering process. This serves as a major issue especially when process of data gathering featured flaws that would interfere with a particular criminal justice issue negatively. Moreover, surveys are not appropriate when it comes to handling controversial issues. For instance, in the area of criminal justice, the participants might not manage to answer the questions revolving around controversies in a precise manner particularly owing to the challenges that emerge when it comes to remembering information associated with them (Explorable, 2012) . In such cases, the only way of realizing the truths surrounding the controversies would be through the utilization of alternative approaches of gathering data, including focus groups and one-on-one interviews, which would facilitate in identification of issues in question appropriately.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Additionally, the utilization of surveys in criminal justice is limited in that the questions posed might be possibly inappropriate. The questions utilized in the event of surveys are usually standardized before the subjects receive them for answering. In this sense, the researchers are required to ensure they develop general questions that have the capacity of accommodating the standard population. Nevertheless, it is crucial to note that the questions might fail to meet all the requirements of issues relating to criminal justice (Explorable, 2012) . In this perspective, therefore, surveys would not be ideal in the area of criminal justice because they are inflexible, inappropriate when dealing with controversial issues, and limitations in the questions posed.
Regarding the case of experiments, they also serve as means of quantitative researches that might not apply well in the area of criminal justice. The major argument against their utilization emanates from the notion that they are significantly subject to the errors that humans make. Errors occur when it comes to experiments and research just like anything else. In this vein, it is crucial to note that any kind of error whether unpredictable, uncontrolled, systemic, or one that results from human acts can lead the experiments validity to be destroyed. Since experiments make it possible to have deep control toward variables, it becomes possible to corrupt or skew data with the goal of meeting the needs of the researcher. Additionally, the process of undertaking experiments takes a considerable amount of time to ensure that each variable is researched fully, which costs more money and takes more time, which might be inconveniencing in the case of the criminal justice environment (GCU, 2017) . Therefore, issues related to errors, long time for undertaking the process, and huge costs involved lead the process to be considered inappropriate in the event of criminal justice research.
References
Explorable. (2012). Advantages and disadvantages of surveys. Retrieved from https://explorable.com/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-surveys
GCU. (2017). Benefits and limitations of experimental research. Retrieved from https://cirt.gcu.edu/research/developmentresources/research_ready/experimental/benefits_limits
Jones, C. (2017). Advantages & disadvantages of qualitative & quantitative research. Retrieved from http://peopleof.oureverydaylife.com/advantages-disadvantages-qualitative-quantitative-research-6184.html
