What do we mean when we talk about climate? In what ways was the climate that Wayne worked in androcentric? Was this detrimental to her development as a scientist? Looking at the creation of scientific knowledge, in what ways could Bateman’s principle be said to be androcentric? Does Wayne offer alternatives?
The term climate with regards to the context of the article means the environment in where women scientists are exposed to, which affects their practices, either in a positive or negative manner. According to Wayne (2010), it is the environment where the women are exposed to provide their activities, scientific knowledge, and data found. In her learning and practice within the scientific field, Wayne was exposed to a culture that focused on men being socially oriented and more acclimated to studies as compared to the females. The scientist was exposed to the climate, which had more emphasis on male education relative to that of females. She was faced with issues such as her information and studies being seen as inferior to those of men on multiple occasions. The climate which she develops in is detrimental to her growth as a scientist in multiple ways. Wayne is motivated by the need to prove herself worthy of the scientific studies she conducts, which helps to keep her on track towards continued studies and research. However, the climate is focused on the male gender, which is hostile to women scientists and limits their success through lack of resources and podiums where they can freely share their ideas. The Bateman’s principle argues that reproductive success is more significant in males than in females, which is an androcentric aspect focused on showing that men are better compared to females, thus arguably a debatable matter. Wayne does offer alternatives to the concept claiming that equality is critical towards leading better lifestyles and in developing more scientists across the globe. She argues that proper embracement of the females can help diversify ideas hence improving scientific outcomes.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
How does Western science exclude people from non-Western cultures? How is Sneha expected to change herself in order to match the expectations of the scientific community? How do these changes affect when and how she is able to contribute to the creation of scientific knowledge?
Western science excludes people from non-Western cultures in many ways. They are seen to be relatively different from those of the west, leading to the idea that they are not worth being part of the students in the science faculty. The scientific community views the female as being inferior to the men as the western culture has developed a stereotype such that the women are not superior in fields related to science and research (Subramaniam, 2010). For Sneha to match expectations of the scientific community, she is expected to not only have more input in her overall studies but also expected to grow her scientific knowledge, conduct more studies and prove that she is worth the position in a scientific community. Moreover, Sneha should also associate with other female scientists in the faculty to help her become acclimated to their culture and ways of life, which is integral to improving her competency in scientific practices. The changes, while having to take much of her time, will be integral towards helping her contribute to creation of scientific knowledge (Sands, 2010). By gaining knowledge in her field of practice and understanding the culture of Western science community, she would have an opportunity to present scientific research, data findings and other components that will give her an opportunity to be recognized in the faculty. This would further improve her ability to create and contribute to knowledge available within the facility.
References
Sands, A. (2010). Never Meant to Survive, a Black Woman’s Journey: 2 An Interview with Evelynn Hammonds. Women, science, and technology (pp. 45-53). Routledge.
Subramaniam, B. (2010). Snow Brown and the Seven Detergents: A Metanarrative3 on Science and the Scientific Method. In Women, Science, and Technology (pp. 54-59). Routledge.
Wayne, M. (2010). Walking a tightrope: The feminist life of a Drosophila biologist. In Women, Science, and Technology (pp. 98-106). Routledge.
