Introduction
The United Nations (UN) has continuously revised its objectives on the global human condition through setting intermediate and long-term goals through agendas that encourage its member states to achieve societal milestones in realizing equality. Among the key agendas that have informed the UN strategies to improve the global state of humanity included the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) that had their timeline elapse in 2015 and the current 2030 Agenda of the SDGs (United Nations, 2015). The SDGs form a critical action plan compiled in a 17 points agenda that seeks to inform the next decade of the UN focus on social elevation from poverty and improving on healthcare systems. The key objective of the UN as an organization through Agenda 2030 anchors on the need for the creation of sustainable and fair health systems for both the local community and planetary biosphere. In such a context, the 2030 SDGs focus on ensuring that at the timeline, the organization can end poverty on a global scale, environmental protection, and sustaining peace into the present and future generations (United Nations, 2015). The paper offers an evaluative discussion on the UN Ambition through the 2030 Agenda of Sustainable Development; the key areas of concern include the viability of SDGs as a workable program as well as the prospect of their achievement by 2030.
Workability of the SDGs Action Plan
The UN SDGs were proposed and later adopted by all UN member countries in 2015, New York City. The 17- point action plan outlined the key integrated actions that all member countries, a signatory to the UN Charter were going to consider in the next phase of Universal action (Dodds, Donoghue, & Roesch, 2016). The SDGs offered a framework and a timeline from which the different goals were to be attained at a global level. The underlined call in the setting of the 2030 UN Agenda was the need to have member countries foster development within their sovereignties through a socially, ecologically, and economic balanced environment (Dodds, Donoghue, & Roesch, 2016). The object of the 17-point action plan was to ensure that there is entrenched sustainability within every country’s development plan without compromising the social, economic, or ecological integrity of their communities or ecology.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The SDGs in their implementation plan provides a strategic work plan that grants members a framework of delivering on the set action plans. The UN action plan into achieving the SDGs by 2030 focuses on pledges and commitment where the current Agenda is anchored on the ideation of “Leave No One Behind” (United Nations, 2015). The theme of the SDGs emphasizes on the value of integrated fast tracking of each member country on their realization of the goals through investments and the outlined sectors that can speed-up the implementation and achievement processes. The proposal and implementation of the SDGs come on the backdrop of the expiry of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) that came to their termination in 2015. The framework of action for the SDGs hence builds on the thematic principles that had been created in the preceding 15 years under the MDGs.
The SDGs offer a new perspective in the realization of the key objective in attaining global equality among the UN member states through the key concepts of eradication of poverty and establishing a healthy planet for prosperity. The objectives of the SDGs offer a robust implementation structure that ensures that all member countries participating in the action plan not only offer guidance but also create partnerships in the realization of the key objectives within the Action plan (Dodds, Donoghue, & Roesch, 2016). Further, the 2030 Agenda offers a timeframe making it easier for monitoring of progress during the 15 years. Implementation guidelines are further of shared value across the globe offering the Agenda 2030 a much encompassing objective since almost all members find the initiatives beneficial in local contexts. The SDGs provide the UN member countries with a progressive and transformative platform to discuss and agree on common good issues that affect the majority of global populations of the UNDP member countries.
The basis of adoption and framework of implementation indicate to a workable program. The implementation of SDGs, therefore, shall anchor, largely on the successes and failures of the MDGs. According to Dodds, Donoghue, and Roesch (2016), UNDP has a scope of what is expected and the deliverables outlined in the achievement of a global program. The largely successful realization of MDGs achievements shall act as a benchmark in the realization and improvements for the implementation of the current global social goals as envisioned in the SDGs (Dodds, Donoghue, & Roesch, 2016). The collaborative approach that has been proposed for the implementation of the SDGs provides a reasonable framework within which it can be possible to resolve the global challenges through creating resilient pathways for the current and future generations.
The Achievement of SDGs by 2030
The success of SDGs would be tremendous as per the models of probability already in place. Largely, SDGs come at a time when the organization has had experience in implementing a globalize scale in the thematic areas of the MDGs. While the MDGs were primarily initiatives starting from the basic concepts. The implementation of SDGs comes at a time when the global community understands the importance of the global corporation. The next phase of human development is anchored on partnerships through trade, peace, and ecological consciousness. The same is not the case when the organization embarked on implementing the MDGs. The change in social attitudes and perspectives, coupled with increased literacy offer SDGs a better success index over the same timelines as MDGs; that were successful in the developing and developed countries (United Nations, 2015). Further, the aspects of socially conscious technology, global trade partnerships, and the increasing need for peace offer a higher optimism when it comes to the realization of the SDGs by 2030 (Dodds, Donoghue, & Roesch, 2016). Today, the world is more connected and united than it was at the onset of the 21st Century. The change in social consciousness has not only influenced the thinking of humanity but also altered the structure of prioritization. Currently, a larger population focuses on social welfare and coexistence as opposed to isolation and nationalism.
The Fundamental Principles of Economic Ideas on SDGs Achievement
Regardless of the expected successes of the SDGs as a Global Agenda, various economic ideologies continue to influence its implementation. Geopolitical ideologies such as economic liberalism, nationalism, and structuralism affect decision-making processes at the international stage. Global leaders always hold different ideologies depending on their countries and societies. As such, the success of SDGs implementation across member countries anchors increasingly on the influence of such economic ideologies. Economic liberal ideologies support free markets and economic freedom. The ideology leans towards capitalism and allows individualistic economic policies (Kay & Gwynne, 2000). Therefore, the ideology poses a threat to ecological sustainability with policies limiting government control on economic activities and development. Economic nationalists are considered protectionists with a leading priority for the national interests as opposed to individual interests. While nationalistic ideas offer social solutions to all citizens through encouraging self-sufficiency within its citizens, the protectionist ideas would restrict partnerships and collaboration with other countries in achieving sustainable development at a global stage (Pickel, 2003). Economic structuralism emphasizes the need for the establishment of structures and institutions that guarantee success. According to Kay and Gwynne (2000), the ideology allows for increased partnerships with a balance on economic gains and the population realizes the impact of such change. Economic structuralism offers a compromised balance between development and social welfare. The implementation of structuralism in the implementation of SDGs offers a breakthrough in establishing integrated systems working through partnerships and collaboration to foster greater benefits.
References
Dodds, F., Donoghue, A. D., & Roesch, J. L. (2016). Negotiating the Sustainable Development Goals: A Transformational Agenda for an Insecure World . Taylor & Francis.
Kay, C., & Gwynne, R. N. (2000). Relevance of structuralist and dependency theories in the neoliberal period: a Latin American perspective. Journal of Developing Societies , 16 (1), 49-69.
Pickel, A. (2003). Explaining, and explaining with, economic nationalism. Nations and Nationalism , 9 (1), 105-127.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform . Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld
United Nations. (2015). The Addis Ababa Action Agenda of the Third International Conference on Financing for Development . Retrieved from http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/CONF.227/L.1
