The speech of the Testament of Hope was delivered by Martin Luther King Junior, in response to the raging racism in the United States of America, in the 1950s. The comprehension covered the causes, instances, and effects of racism and possible ways to recover from the menace. During the speeches, several other activists were also fighting with the American administration to call this inhumane behavior to a standstill. Leaders and critics from all sectors of the country condemned the behavior. For instance, some leaders quoted the religious writings while other used instances from the parliament and the court rulings on the equity in service and association of the while people with the people of color.
The speech noted that racism was so harsh and cruel that many Negros could not afford many necessary assets and services, which their fellow white men enjoyed. For instance, black people were not allowed to access the libraries; white people meant big restaurants only for the white people, some schools were strictly not accepting black students, etc. Additionally, in the economic sector, the white employers had no space for black labor. For the few black men who got jobs in the white merchants and employers, their pay was minimal compared to their colleagues' pay while colleagues worked at the same level.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Dr. King narrated why there was a particular need to include everyone in the country in all productive activities and view black people like Americans and grant their worth. Besides, other human rights activists fought against racism from different perspectives. Firstly, in the economic view, the people of color's seclusion from participating in productive activities was a loss for the individuals and the entire country. The loss was so because as firms incorporated more employees to work, producers served much more products to the market, and the economic growth would significantly improve. From a religious perspective, activists argued that the holy Bible noted that God created every person in God's image. Precisely, this meant that no human was less before the eye of God. Therefore, it was essential to see God's image in everyone, including the black people, rather than excluding them as lesser human beings. Again, during the parliament proceedings, when passing any bill into law, or any other argument in the national assembly, the leaders argued based on the people. Notably, the leaders did not refer to the white people, the rich people, the poor people, not even the American citizens, but all the persons living in the united states were subject to abide by the law, be it a restrictive measure or a freedom right.
Again, the nature and life of man are critically dependent on freedom. Huma rights activists joined Martin Luther King in arguing that the depriving of freedom to the black people was equitable to deprive life. Fundamental freedom, which the black could not access, included the right to vote, the freedom to speak out their struggle and challenges to the administration, freedom of association, and their freedom to choose who they are- democrats, republicans, or socialists.
In conclusion, the speech was a campaign for a hopeful nation that America should rise upon racism and counteract the behavior one day. Activists challenged leaders to spearhead the discussion to end the inhumane norm and enhance comfort among all Americans. Many facts from different backgrounds displayed in the argument against racism were strong and convincing.
