The main idea in both Julia Serano’s work and that of Kimberle Crenshaw is that both works delve much into challenging mainstream ideologies about women, especially liberal feminism. Serano’s main idea is about challenging traditional ideologies, which hold that transgender does not have a place in the society and women of such nature do not belong. Similarly, liberal feminism is apparent in Crenshaw’s work as it delves squarely into political and legal abilities of women of color, and encourages readers to avoid discrimination. A change of attitude towards women concerning roles and orientations in the society is a critical matter, and the two authors try to decipher the same in their literary pieces of work.
Serano, and her book on transgender, Whipping Girl, provides an understanding of the issues of transgender. It is a compelling and provocative literary piece of work, which is educative. On the hand, Crenshaw, and her book offers an inspiring discussion on the issues affecting women in the society. In both cases, two authors delve much into feminism while challenging mainstream liberal feminism. The main focus of liberal feminism is to make political and legal rights of women to be equal to those of men. In analyzing both works, Serano has focused on challenging viewpoints of the target audience to perceive the issue of transgender as something normal. In brief, it is a challenge to legalities on what people often believe in. Similarly, Crenshaw focuses on legal and political issues surrounding women of color while trying to introduce ethical and pragmatic perceptions based on traditional identities.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
In Crenshaw’s work, the consequences of the civil rights movement are that they often tend to ignore disparities within target groups. Pointedly, by politicizing race, the civil rights movements have snubbed how gender affects oppressions geared toward women in American society (Crenshaw, 2005 ) . Similarly, feminists have tended to overlook racism’s impact on the lives of black women. In brief, the work tends to critique liberal feminists and shed light into critical things surrounding women. On the other hand, Serano, through sharing some of her personal experiences and observations, reveals to the target audience how fear, doubt, and dismissiveness towards the feminine tends to shape societal attitudes on transgender women, gender, and even sexuality (Serano, 2007). It is a critique in some way to what liberal feminism believes in as it tends to elaborate on things that are often ignored about transgender women so that readers can embrace a broad aspect of the matter.
The two authors offer a broad perception of matters surrounding women, especially on issues of gender, politics, and legalities. As a reader, one thing of importance that can be drawn from the readings is that feminism is a complex matter, and perceptions of liberal feminism do not explain everything. In both cases, information from the authors can be useful at improving the belief of the women on matters of feminism. Also, it provides additional strategies and viewpoints that liberal feminists can use to promote their campaign.
On the whole, Crenshaw and Serano have insightful perspectives on the plights of women and change of ideologies on what people should believe in. Notably, the transgender issue is scorned in the society, and something should be done to make people change their view on it-which is Serano’s motive. On the other hand, Crenshaw’s target is that liberal feminists often overlook some matters surrounding women, especially when it comes to oppressions on gender factors. In the final analysis, the right perception should be embraced if rights and plights of women are to be given precedence.
References
Crenshaw, K. (2005 ). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color .
Serano, J. (2007). Whipping Girl: A Transsexual Woman on Sexism and the Scapegoating of Femininity.
