Organizations use analytical and emergent approaches in several ways. For instance, an analytical approach is a scenario whereby an organization applies analysis to break down a problem into elements that enhances its solving. On the contrary, the emergent approach is a set of actions or behaviors that an organization applies overtime to deal with a problem. This paper seeks to explain the similarities and differences that exist in these approaches.
According to Lim et al. (2020), an analytical approach to strategic management gives a clear vision of the ideas and the purpose before starting the strategy. On the contrary, the emergent approach is not clear on the strategy's purpose as it uses different ideas to get different results. It is important to note that the goals of strategic management are developed before the process starts.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Both analytical and emergent approaches to strategic management are similar when it comes to analyzing the organization's resources, but when the strategy process begins, the two approaches differ. The analytical approach to strategic management tends to use a reasonable approach when deciding on the emergent approach, which uses a creative approach when making a decision.
When using the analytical approach to strategic management, it is difficult to make any adjustments to the plan and the strong conditions. The emergent approach is flexible to any business environment (Zieba et al., 2016). Besides, the analytical approach to strategic management is well-used to control, unlike the emergent approach with unclear control and tends to bring a strategic pile up because of its unclear plans making it difficult to check the performance targets.
Combining the two models comes with benefits that include high management control in a disorganized environment, creating new opportunities. It also helps to respond to external pressure faster (Geels et al., 2016). Also, combining the two models brings focus to the business and makes the target more achievable, increasing the performance of the company, and it always motivates both the customers and the employees. More resources are allocated systematically using the business practices used to create more ideas if the two models are combined.
Conclusively, applying the two approaches is more advantageous as compared to the use of a single approach. The combination of both approaches helps an organization constantly invent and grow bigger, helping it acknowledge the different changes in a more workable manner.
References
Geels, F. W., Berkhout, F., & van Vuuren, D. P. (2016). Bridging analytical approaches for low-carbon transitions. Nature Climate Change , 6 (6), 576-583.
Lim, H., Davey, T., & Wells, C. S. (2020). A recursion‐based analytical approach to evaluate the performance of mst. Journal of Educational Measurement .
Zieba, M., Bolisani, E., & Scarso, E. (2016). Emergent approach to knowledge management by small companies: Multiple case-study research. Journal of Knowledge Management , 20 (2), 292–307.
