Both the Ancient Egyptians and the Buddhists' contemplation of the idea of the soul is radically contradictory with minor similarities. Ancient Egypt believed that the soul took the form of both physical and spiritual, where it existed even after one is dead. The manifestation of the immortality of the soul took three unique disjointed entities, the Ka , the Ba , and the Akh . The ka represents the spiritual essence of the person; it is formed at the time of birth and departs when the individual dies. The ba is the most mobile part of the soul, constituting the non-physical form representing qualities that make up a person. Also, it moves between realms specifically from the dead body to the afterlife. Lastly, the Akh is the dominant player in the afterlife; upon the death of the ba and ka, they are restored to regenerate the akh.
As per the Ancient Egyptian customs, there was such a thing as an eternal, separate soul as they continued to live even in the afterlife. Likewise, the idea of soul transmigration was likely as the soul could be passed from one vessel to another, be it human, animal, or an inanimate object. Also similar to Buddhism, rebirth in Ancient Egypt was possible; the Egyptians buried their dead in a proper custom to help the departed to transform into an Akh to stop rebirth from happening or even possible permanent death.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Unlike the ancient Egyptians, the Buddhists believed in the concept of ' anatman' no soul. Buddhist consider that the soul is purely an impermanent fusion of substance, feelings, intuition, consciousness, and thoughts that disappear and become non-existent after one dies. Even though Buddhism approves of the soul Reincarnation and Karma , like the ancient Egyptians, the Buddhists do not subscribe to the concept of soul transmigration following the belief on soullessness.
