Epistemology is a philosophical study of origin, nature and human limits of human knowledge. It analyses the relationship of knowledge with similar notations such as belief justification and truth ( Brigandt, 2015) . Epistemology tries to give answers to a fundamental question: which elements distinguish true knowledge and false knowledge? Which practically translates this question into scientific methodology issues? The artificial intelligence, as well as the process approach of information to psychology, is some of the aspects that develop the pillars of cognition science. The strategies that mimic the human knowledge capacity in an artificial intelligent form get attempted from the need to create computer programs.
First knowledge theories stressed on a permanent character, while the later theories emphasize on its continuous development, situational-dependence active interference with the world and its objects and subjects. In Plato's argument, he views knowledge as a mere awareness of absolute universal forms that independently exist in various concepts that need to get understood well. The empirical method used in the process of collecting information on logics gets emphasized by Aristotle. Also, the universal values to him are compulsory as well as regarding knowledge as an apprehension. From resurgence, rationalism and empiricism as the two central epistemological positions subjugated viewpoint.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Rationalism visions facts as a product of normal replication while pragmatism views as the product of sensory observation. The empiricism implementation in advanced sciences experimental headed to an aspect of knowledge which is implicitly by a lot of people nowadays ( Brigandt, 2015) . According to reflection-correspondence theory view knowledge product from object reflection through sensory organs that are supported different observation devices to the brain. According to Plato's conception, knowledge has to be developed through observation but has no a priori existence. Any piece of knowledge that is proposed should be either corresponding to external reality or not corresponding. Now we can be in practice never reaching complete knowledge, but such knowledge is a slight conceivable reflection of reality
The pragmatic epistemology gives unclear answers to question for the existence of models. This unclear circumstance is an assumption that some intuitions complement models ( Brigandt, 2015) . Constructivism accepts that knowledge made up from scrape by the theme of understanding. There are no unbiased experimental facts and cognitive structures that support it. The idea of the reflection of external reality is rejected.
Reflexivity advocates hegemonic values of social-technical fields, properties about an intellectual field and a weapon in scraps over status. It enacted as a hide and seeks game where one affects play and may have difficulty ascertaining the author's position ( Brigandt, 2015) . In all begin by identifying objectification and end rejecting it through self-absorption. Reflexivity has been declared typically as progressive. However, through falling reflexivity to personalized reflection, it makes life in society possible. Individuals considering their situations reveals upon themselves do not necessarily do it in the same way. Reflexivity can occur when theories in the discipline should apply convincingly to itself, for example where the theories of construction knowledge
People are prejudiced by the beliefs and norms of their society and cultures, and this influence may take a general level that affects a large population. The main social structure involves roles, social class, social institution, culture, and social status (Winch, 2015). An individual's location in the social structure underlies his or her perceptions of behaviors and attitudes. An individual develops all these in the location of the social fabric. According to symbolic interactionists, individuals surround themselves with personal fizzes that are protected by eye contact. People have a different perception of how much they use to keep physical apart from people in a specific situation.
References
Brigandt, I. (2015). Social values influence the adequacy conditions of scientific theories: beyond inductive risk. Canadian Journal of Philosophy , 45 (3), 326-356.
Winch, P. (2015). The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy . Routledge.
