Several portions of scripture speak about beneficence but the most notable and relevant one is the gospel according to Saint Mathew Chapter 7 vs 12. This verse points out that in all things, humans should do unto others as they would want others to do unto them (Batson et al., 2003). This scripture makes the doer the judge of what amounts to beneficence and what does not. The actor is supposed to be in the shoes of the recipient of the action, then determine if the action is right or wrong, based on if they would expect the same results.
When there is interference of justice through politics, equal distribution of health insurance is at stake hence, beneficence is compromised. When an illness strikes, for instance, the patient is not able to work and earn while contemporaneously being in dire need of funds for treatment. When this happens, the patient is liable to use up any available savings before succumbing to a treatable condition because there is no more money for treatment (Norheim, 2016). Any other person depending on the patient is bound to suffer lack because the ailment is consuming all available funds.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Political considerations such as being a conservative, liberal, or the kind of capitalism that will attract more votes can interfere with justice, placing equal distribution of insurance at stake. When this happen, it means that politicians are placing their political interests over the life and welfare of the populace (Almgren, 2017). Furthermore, political interference on how healthcare resources are distributed may breach the ethical principle of justice. When politicians compromise with justice in matters health care, patients in need of insurance services will not be able to benefit from the services they need most. The politicians involved will, therefore, not be doing to others as they would want to be done unto them, hence compromising on beneficence.
References
Almgren, G. (2017). Health care politics, policy, and services: a social justice analysis . Springer publishing company
Batson, C. D., Lishner, D. A., Carpenter, A., Dulin, L., Harjusola-Webb, S., Stocks, E. L., ... & Sampat, B. (2003). “... As you would have them do unto you”: Does imagining yourself in the other's place stimulate moral action?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 29 (9), 1190-1201
Norheim, O. F. (2016). Ethical priority setting for universal health coverage: challenges in deciding upon fair distribution of health services. BMC Medicine , 14 (1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0624-4
