Brown vs. Board of Education case results is emblematic of social equity as it was the landmark case that changed the legalized segregation in the South. The case was essential to social equity even though there is still social marginalization; structural inequities exist in line with socioeconomic status, sexual orientations, national origins, race, and gender, with the democratic decay sliding people further from the ideal world they wish to exist in (Brown, 2015). The court systems have the power to implement and change laws which in the process impact public administrations. Thus, the judicial has a massive role in creating public policy, and the relationship between eh public administrators and courts must be maintained professionally. Social equity within the public administrations is denied as equitable, jus and fir management of the institutions that serve the public by contract or directly and honest and fair distributions of public services and the public policy implementations with the commitment to ensure equity, justice, and fairness in the creation of the public policy. The pubic administrator ensures equity in terms of the distribution of resources. Distributes equity comprises providing the commitment to targeted interventions, equal access, and provisions of resources so that when efforts are made to reduce risk actors and correct the wrongs for the underserved groups historically.
In recent years some ruling made at the Supreme Court has affected how administrators develop policies. Some policies were created that discriminate against the LGBT community, which led to a bad relationship between the U military and the LGBT community. The service member was restricted from revealing their sexual orientations and banned gay applicants from military service. The Supreme Court ruled against that decisions and permitted military members to operate without any discrimination.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
In the Brown versus Board of Education, it was a significant decision n the US supreme courts whereby the court ruled that the state laws that support social discriminations are unconstitutional. The court unanimously agreed that the different education facilities were promoting social inequality, which violated the equal protection clause within the US Constitution's fourteen amendments. Nonetheless, the decisions on a 14 page did not specify the method for bringing to an end the racial discriminations in schools. Second, decisions by the country ordered the state to desegregate at a deliberate speed.
In the current world issues of inequity, the divisive world is at the center of public frustrations and policy debates about social problems. There is widening of the income gaps unequal accessibility to Education and health resources with tensions between the social and racial groups at the center of conversations, specifically for the public agencies looking to resolve them. To properly discuss those matters, it is essential to reflect one evolution and history of the equity concept, why it consent the public administrations, and the instance of adverse outcomes rectified and caused by the state (Young et al., 2015). Through examining the social equity conversations, the public administrators might understand better the way of minimizing inequalities in society.
In conclusion, public administrators can execute their duty in civil rights movements by ensuring equitable distribution of resources. Social equity faces many challenges, including widening disparities of income, gaps in health outcomes between ethnic and racial groups unequal aces of employments. The public administrator can address these issues huge fraction of policies that hinder discrimination. In Brown versus Board of Education's the public administrator should have reacted by creating a policy that ensures all children are accepted to public schools despite their race or ethnic background.
References
Brown, F. (2015). Educational reform and African American male students after Brown v. Board of Education. International Journal of Educational Reform , 24 (4), 321-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678791502400402
Young, P., Dolph, D., & Russo, C. J. (2015). The impact of Brown v. Board of Education on student learning in public schools. International Journal of Educational Reform , 24 (4), 335-348. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678791502400403
