In order to select the inequities that are more relevant to community health, some initial preparation is necessary. This ensures that the proiritizaton process is implemented impartially to the most crucial matters. This is done using the community health assessment toolkit to ensure maximum focus on the areas of priority. This should be done despite conducting a community health assessment which also weeds out the health inequities in the communities assigned (Spradley & Judith, 2005). The paper discusses five areas from the toolkit prioritization criteria process, and one from the extra prioritization criteria, in reference to the community health analysis conducted on senior citizens.
The selection of an appropriate criteria for analysis is essential in determining whether the risk of poor health has resulted from population growth spurt, for example. It is important to fully understand the extent of the problem, to enable them to assign the most relevant care to the most vulnerable individuals. The paper focuses on a vulnerable group of people, senior citizens, based on the level of education and poverty. In a majority of cases, poor education leads to poverty in general in a community, and vice versa, making he two factors interlinked. One of the key points of the assessment is the ability of the community in question to take action, and whether they are wiiling to take the necessary steps. It is also vital to get feedback from community members on their wealth and health statuses as a community (Sharpe et al., 2000). The most assured way of improving the community’s health and promoting it’s well being, the changes required must be tied to the needs of the community. This will encourage the community to embrace the change and implement the measures proposed from the analysis.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Before embarking on any analysis, enquiry to previous or current programs on the issue in question should be made. This will help establish a more solid plan to address these barriers and challenges that might be affecting the interventions. For example, it needs to be established whether a plan is already in place, and whether it works or has failed to accomplish its goals. This enables one to format their analysis to either improve on any interventions already in place or determine the pros and cons of those that failed before. If there were no interventions in place before, then the analysis could be used to create a new one for the community to reap benefits from. Hospitals should also work together with the assessors to help mitigate and eliminate any health inequities in their respective communities (Carroll-Scott, Henson, Kolker, & Purtle, 2017) .
References.
Association for Community Health Improvement. (2017). Community health assessment
toolkit. Retrieved July 2, 2020 from http://www.healthycommunities.org/Education/toolkit/files/step5-select- priority.shtml#.W_S6NeJRfIW
Carroll-Scott, A., Henson, R. M., Kolker, J., & Purtle, J. (2017). The role of nonprofit hospitals
in identifying and addressing health inequities in cities. Health Affairs, 36 (6), 1102-1109.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0033
Sharpe, P. A., Greaney, M. L., Lee, P. R., & Royce, S. W. (2000). Assets-oriented community
assessment. Public Health Reports , 115 (2-3), 205.
Spradley, W. B., & Judith, A. A. (2005). Community health nursing. Conceptsand practice .
