Crime Scene Investigation: The Use of Technology

The fact that investigating using notes is essential as it enables investigators not to overlook specific information concerning the case. However, written records pose numerous drawbacks, especially when other parties are reviewing the notes. Embracing technology, on the other hand, allows detectives to view the case from different perspectives. For active investigations, speech-recognition and other technologies offer better results. Embracing technology is the best means of accurate detection (Thaman, 2016). In Luke 8:1-11, the passage is explaining the parable of the sower ( The New King James Version ) . Sowers do not limit themselves to specific grounds. Instead, they spread their seeds everywhere. The same is applicable in investigations; detectives must utilize all available resources to attain accurate and useful results. Each case is unique, and specific technologies can offer different insights into the probe. However, other alternatives are also present. The notion that computer files are corruptible and can be lost is a factual limitation of using technology. Additionally, speech recognition technology may not offer an accurate depiction of the situation. Technology offers better alternatives in the long term in investigations as well as storage. Technology has explicitly advanced storage capacity, written notes, pose numerous drawbacks that are addressed by technology. Written notes present the critical issue of retention, as stated. Additionally, police handwriting must be considered. Overall, it is essential to appreciate both aspects of investigations. Both technology and written notes offer a different view of the situations (Baechler et al., 2017). 1 Corinthians 12:21 states that the eye cannot say to the hand, "I don't need you!" And the head cannot say to the feet, "I don't need you ( The New King James Version )! " Similarly, technology may rely on written notes if data is corrupted or lost. On the other hand, written records require technology when it comes to storage and provision of visual data of the scene.

References

Baechler, S., Gélinas, A., Tremblay, R., Lu, K., & Crispino, F. (2017). Smartphone and Tablet Applications for Crime Scene Investigation: State of the Art, Typology, and Assessment Criteria.  Journal of Forensic Sciences ,  62 (4), 1043-1053. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13383

Thaman, S. (2016). The Use of Information and Communications Technology in Criminal Procedure in the USA.  Cybercrime, Organized Crime, and Societal Responses , 103-131. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44501-4_6

The New King James Version  (NKJV)