In recent years, even though criminal justice organizations have implemented increasingly “get-tough” approaches, reactions to crimes that depend on the punishments alone have failed to our societies securer. Rather, they have generated increasing prison systems (Feeley, 2017) . These have the possibility to more damage than good and put significant strains on the budgets of the government. Increasing jail verdicts does little in deterring criminal behaviors. Longer sentences are related to greater re-offending rates (Neubauer & Fradella, 2018) . The problems increase when the convicts go back to their communities. In any justice system, most of the settings for punishments to be successful shall not exist. It implies that programmes, strategies, and policies that concentrate on rehabilitation of the offenders shall have superior probability of success in improving the safety of the community and preventing crimes. The strategies take advantage of substantial beneficial prospects that originate by closely checking at daily interactions and social functioning of inmates (Pound, 2018) . The challenges depend on making sure that correct strategies are conveyed to the correct individuals at the correct time.
It is first important that low-risk prisoners have negligible contacts with entrenched offenders. Extended contacts are merely likely to intensify their reoffending risks (Feeley, 2017) . This has repercussions for the courts, design of jail, and management of inmate cases. Judges should have the authority to shift low-risk prisoners from prisons and therefore reduce contacts with high-risk offenders.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
First, it is important that low-risk offenders have minimal contact with higher-risk offenders (Pound, 2018) . Extended contact is only likely to increase their risk of recidivism. This has implications for prisoner case management, prison design and for the courts. Associated with this is the need to establish effective community-based rehabilitations, leaving jails for entrenched and dangerous prisoners. Secondly, concentrated energies are needed to design innovative strategies for the inmates identified as low-risk offenders. Thirdly, the personnel should be properly nominated, resourced, trained, and supervised to deliver the greatest-value rehabilitation services to the challenging and most complex individuals (Feeley, 2017). Ultimately, it is significant to show that the plans really make the convicts better, not worse. The evaluation types that are required to feature positive changes to completion of programmes are cross-jurisdictional collaboration, complex, and need huge numbers of players. National approaches to the evaluation of programmes are sorely required (Neubauer & Fradella, 2018) . We should reinforce efforts to create a right rehabilitation system. Such systems shall be internally consistent, all coherent and comprehensive in using evidence-based practices at all levels.
References
Feeley, M. (2017). Two models of the criminal justice system: An organizational perspective. In Crime, Law and Society (pp. 119-137). Routledge.
Neubauer, D. W., & Fradella, H. F. (2018). America's courts and the criminal justice system . Cengage Learning.
Pound, R. (2018). Criminal justice in America . Routledge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-X5m8h0CYjQ
