The article by Borghard & Lonergan (2017) discusses the various dynamics of coercion experienced in cyberspace. The article assesses how states use cyberspace to exert traditional coercion. The authors stipulate how nations may use cyberspace to push their political agendas through issuing threats. The article argues that cyberspace is a key tool of national coercion; however, it must be coupled with other powers within a nation’s stability.
In his article, Nye Jr. discusses the issues of dissuasion and deterrence in cyberspace. The article argues that the main problem faced in the current cyberspace regulation is the lack of adequate deterrence policies (Nye Jr., 2017). The paper compares the deterrence problem to the increasing number of internet users across the globe. With the increasing users, it is difficult for governments to monitor their people for effective cybercrime deterrence.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Slayton, in her article, discusses the conceptions, assessments, and causes of cyber offence-defence balance. The article discusses how governments can ensure both effective offensive and defensive cyber systems (Slayton, 2017). Without a balance in the two cyberspace dynamics, a nation’s cyber stability remains weak. Cyber offence-defence balance refers to the ways in which nations or organizations can maintain a healthy offensive and defensive cybersecurity.
Lucas article discusses the various concepts within the broad cyber topic. The author starts by showing how various scholars have often differed on the conceptualization of cybersecurity through the development of varying theories (Lucas, 2017). In his argument, Lucas recognizes the need for adhering to the multidisciplinary approach to cybersecurity, whereby scholars agree with views from others rather than trying to push their ideologies as the best. In the multidisciplinary approach, cybersecurity topics from different disciplines must be recognized for the development of this topic.
In his article, Gibson examines the issue of cyber-war as an emerging global threat. Gibson discusses how cyber-wars disrupt the normal function of organizations, including militaries. He shows how the modern-military gear demand strong cyber-security as interference could lead to catastrophic impacts (Freedman, 1984). In his argument, Gibson states how nuclear warheads could be left helpless if their systems are interrupted by opposing sides.
References
Erica D. Borghard & Shawn W. Lonergan (2017) The Logic of Coercion in Cyberspace. Security Studies , 26:3, 452-481
Freedman, W. (1984). Cyberwar. pp. 1-5
Lucas, K. (2018). The Quest for Cyber Theory: The clash of conceptions. ProQuest Ebook .
Nye Jr. (2017). Deterrence and Dissuasion in Cyberspace. International Security, 41:3. Pp. 44-71.
Slayton, R. (2017). What is the cyber offense-defense balance? International Security . 41:3. Pp. 72-109.
