After reading my colleague’s posts, it is evident that organizations need to embark on restricting sexual harassment. This is the first thing that they are required to implement. As well, this is the major similarity in all the postings. Majority of my colleagues have applied the measures outlined in the course book by Mr. Green. When comparing my posting and that of my colleagues, they are at some point different. I have noted that my paper was too general as opposed to that of my colleagues. This is because my classmates seem to state and outline key laws necessary for inhibiting sexual harassment in the workplace. The responses of the other group members show that sexual harassment is an inferior move by any individual or organization towards another.
After reading my colleague's postings, I think that it would be essential to adjust my paper ethically. First, it would be of great importance to include the course reading theories and policies meant to restrict sexual harassment. For instance, Mr. Green's argument on non-dating co-workers and also between low and high workers would be of great importance to be included in my paper.Additionally, dating ought to be eradicated to evade favoritism in the workplace. Nevertheless, I do not mean that my paper is vague, it only necessitates some amendments. My paper has a solid structure an information regarding on the suitable policies that need to be employed by employers in a situation where sexual harassment is exercised. Additionally, my paper is unique as it expresses how the workers need to behave, for example, having decent dressing especially among the females. Finally, it is important to form and execute more policies accordingly.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
