There are two significant problems linked to disaster management in the US. The issues are connected to the application of the cluster approach in dealing with the menace in one way or the other. As much as the cluster approach comes with some form of effectiveness in the application process, there are a few challenges that still linger to interfere with the same method. First, some gaps are existing in the prediction of leadership in the process based on the high turnover rates of the coordinators in the cluster approach. Second, some barriers include the partnership program in the cluster approach. The program has failed to create a sense of NGO ownership and involvement in the program (Grossman, 2018). However, with better management of the opportunities available in the program, better results could be attained in the cluster approach used by the US government. The two critical organizations dealing with humanitarian issues include the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA) and the United Nations Children Fund (UNICEF). To begin with, the UNOCHA serves the role of a broad range of tasks linked to top disaster management in cases of emergencies in member countries. Disaster management is categorized under three significant issues. First is the coordination of the response to humanitarian factors. It also does this process through policy development and the provision of support to the community. Finally, it does this through the advocating of humanitarian services aimed at delivering adequate support to emergencies. UNICEF on its side takes the role of offering immediate aid to children in areas prone to conflicts (Fernandes et al., 2018). The response is essential in that young mothers and children are often the most marginalized population in most areas. Emergency crisis management in the US faces some obstacles in the way toward the implementation of the programs. These pressing issues include the imbalance in natural disaster management and the focus on homeland security in the country. The other challenging issue in this program lies with the involvement of the public in the preparedness planning stage of disaster mitigation policies. These problems tend to bring in an ineffective partnership program that would include the business community and thus helps in cutting the general funding to the process (Grossman, 2018). Such obstacles and challenges can be overcome by ensuring that the activities aimed at the provision of emergency management are streamlined using the correct policies to make them viable soon. Based on the lessons learned from this course, it is significant to note that there has been a new path in dealing with emergency services in most of the programs in disaster management in the country and also globally. There is a need for emergency managers to embrace the knowledge used in maintaining the hazards approach, handling the response plan by the federal government, and utilizing the five core pillars used in the emergency management system in the US. However, it is important to note that the DHS and FEMA have vehemently opposed the ideas levied in these lessons (Asghar et al., 2018). They have thus returned to a single hazard focus as it used to take place in the 1950s. This gesture brings much confusion into the avenues used in the mitigation process of disasters across the country.
References
Asghar, T., Rasool, S., Iqbal, M., Qayyum, Z., Noor Mian, A., & Ubakanma, G. (2018). Feasibility of Serverless Cloud Services for Disaster Management Information Systems.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Fernandes, E., Shetty, S., Shivalli, S. S., & Fernandes, V. (2018). Analysis of fire disaster management practices and perceptions among urban residents of Mangaluru city. The CHD Journal , 1 (1).
Grossman, R. I. (2018). Disaster Management. Radiology , 180413.
