Social sciences have over time been utilized to help in understanding the activities of people across different spheres. Social human studies are the humanities that manage the social contrasts of man. The ontological studies clarifiy these social aberrations that are animalist and strictly simultaneous. They comprise of the extreme orders, by escalating culturalism and strengthening musings that accentuate contrasts of locals or aboriginals. Two films which comprise of 'Kikkik' and 'let's walk together as one' have been used in this paper to understand why aboriginal discrimination was prevalent in North America.
The concept of settler colonization could have come about due to differences in race, since most blacks who were natives were brutally mistreated and discriminated against ( Kottak, 2015). Also, the concept of settler colonization would be addressed in the let's walk together as one film, which also connects to the cultural anthropology. In the second film, Kikkik, the theme is on the deaths that happened due to land grabbing and mistreatment of the indigenous people by the government. It is a tale of how the government mistakes, including the starvation of the citizens, murder cases led to the loss of lives in Canada, but at last, justice is achieved.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Kikkik is interviewed in the court charged with the murder of Otek, who was a great friend to her husband, Haluk. The crime and criminal negligence that she had, later led to the death of her daughter. These deaths prompted Kikkik's children to look out for answers to what happened, which poses a challenge to the government of Canada. She narrates how times were tough for her and her siblings after the death of her father and, generally, how the government of Canada took advantage of the native people and grabbed their land. This film, therefore, is a way that Canada uses to be in terms of its history in the northern and the native people.
The first film was produced in 2001 and is about 52 minutes. It is an excellent documentary that shows the mistreatment of the indigenous people in Canada. The history in this film is beneficial in understanding the consequences of criminal neglect by the authority to its citizens and also how human decency is achieved. The Let's Walk Together as One film was produced in 2019 by Daniel Webb and takes 1 hour 22 minutes to watch. It is an excellent calling to the native people of Australian and the Indian sovereignty to unite and work together in eradicating discrimination.
Furthermore, the first film is a call to all the native Nuu-chah-nulth, and Bolivian peoples featured to push for the justice and avoidance of settler colonization. This type of conquest took place when the island was taken away from the native people because it was an excellent place to stay. The film would target any person whose interest is in social justice to all who need to understand the Latin American's past and also the history of the local island of Vancouver. It points out the fight for equality by the leaders of the native nations in North America who represented all the indigenous people around the world.
The intended audience of the Kikkik film is the Canadian government and also the citizens in general. It poses a challenge on what actions that the authority has to take to protect its citizens, to keep law and order in the country without discriminating against people from the minority group. Also, the citizens are targeted in understanding the human decency and how to speak up for their rights. Most of the citizens who were moved from their land did not want to vacate, yet they were dying of hunger. The government had to act on its stand to save them, which shows carelessness and ignorance of the citizens. The film also creates awareness to the people about criminal negligence and the results it can have. Kikkik was not aware of how lousy murder was, and hence she admitted to having killed with a knife unknowingly.
'Let's walk together as one' is a film whose production was dedicated to the late Dr. Simon Lucas. It showed how events of 1974 when the world council of indigenous people (WCIP) was formed. The events took place in port Alberni in 1975, and this film is a reminder of how the committee in charge of fighting for justice worked hard to accomplish it. The council was founded by late George Manuel, who believed in putting effort together to protect the integrity of the minority people across the globe.
The production of the second film was motivated by the thirst for answers that Kikkik's daughter had. She wanted to know who her parents were and why they had been killed when she was just young. Her main goal was to seek justice for what happened to them and the pain that the children went through due to death. It was also a cry for justice of indigenous people in Canada to the government, for they had been neglected for so long and left to die of hunger.
The key theme of the first film was to fight for the rights of the indigenous people worldwide through the council. This council fought against disparities in terms of education, land ownerships, employments, and all kinds of slavery. Indians and Black people in the US have been racialized in limiting habits that reflect their various employments in the improvement of US society. Dim people's mistreatment made a far-reaching logical characterization that normally oppressed the children of a slave and some other parent ( Currie, Wild, Schopflocher, al., 2012)
With the effect of subjugation, this logical order ended up being racialized totally in the "one-drop rule," whereby any proportion of African heredity, paying little heed to how remote, and paying little regard to phenotypical appearance, makes an individual Black. For Indians, as a glaring contrast, non-Indian parentage exchanged off their indigeneity, making "mutts," a framework that suffers as blood quantum rules. Rather than enslaved peoplee, whose multiplication extended their owners' wealth, Indigenous people prevented pioneers' passage to the land, so their extension was counterproductive. At this moment, restrictive racial portrayal of Indians empowered the basis of removal.
Along these lines, it is impossible to assume that pilgrim expansionism or massacre has been focused at particular ethnicities because a race cannot be said that it is given. It is made in the focusing on. Dark people were racialized as slaves; subjugation built up their obscurity. Correspondingly, Indigenous North Americans were not executed, driven away, romanticized, acclimatized, fenced-in, raised White, and regardless, cleared out as the primary owners of the land; notwithstanding, as Indians. Roger Smith has missed this point in hoping to perceive disastrous losses slaughtered for where they are and misused individuals killed for what their identity is ( Currie, Wild, Schopflocher et al., 2012)
Most definitely, where they are is the kind of individuals they are, and not simply by their retaliation. As Deborah Bird Rose has pointed out, to impede pioneer colonization, the nearby should simply stay at home. Whatever pioneers may state—and they all around have a lot to express—the fundamental basis in removal isn't race or religion, ethnicity, assessment of progress, be that as it may, access to a region. Territoriality is a pioneer colonialism's specific, last part.
Some of the critical themes depicted in Kikkik’s film include criminal negligence, murder, and discrimination of the indigenous people in Canada. The thirst for justice is also seen as the narrator seeks to understand how the government neglects major issues like murder and starvation. Kikkik buried her daughter alive, thinking that she was dead, and this was a criminal act, but she did not know. The daughter was rescued by kind people, however, and grew up to be someone high in the society with so much love and enjoyable lessons for the community.
The central theme for both films is the discrimination of the native people. This film is open to all people with a deep urge to learn about the historical events of Latin America and politics around indigenous people in Canada. The disparities were not only because of who they are but also where they were from. In the first film, for instance, the people from North America were discriminated against based on them being Indians and not whites even if they were. European powers in North America initially legitimated themselves through arrangement connections went into by Europeans and indigenous countries ( Smith, 2012).
North American pioneer states for instance United States and Canada, with their ancestor states France, Spain, Holland , and England picked up authenticity as genuine substances just by the communicated assent through an arrangement of the original inhabitants and authorities of North America. The establishing records of state power perceive this reality: all Dutch and French bargains with indigenous people groups, the Treaty of Utrecht, the Articles of Capitulation, and the Royal Proclamation made in a setting of military interdependency between the British and indigenous countries all contain an express reference to the free nationhood of indigenous people groups ( Bals, Turi,Skre, et al., 2010)
Due to the European examination and disclosure offered a way to deal with the settlement, with its going with prerequisite for counterbalance diplomatic relations with aboriginal nations, the nations' agreement records explained the reference to the distinctive political nearness and territorial self-rule of aboriginal social orders. None of this chronicled arranged assortment is replicated in the certified antiquity and lawful bases of pioneer state power today. Or then again, perhaps, Canada and the United States have remained in contact with self-serving records of introduction, triumph, and settlement that crash any reference to the main relations between household social requests and Europeans ( Snelgrove, Dhamoon, & Corntassel,2014).
This post facto confirmation of European "impact" is constrained by two basic condemnation. The first is legitimate: the insignificant documentation of European insistences of definitive influence doesn't generally show proof of its achievement. European control over a specific region was the flawed, most ideal situation, and the political nearness of European pioneer states was a masterminded reality until well into the nineteenth era.
The WCIP, which separated in 1996 due to internal inquiries, was focused on making solidarity among Indigenous social orders all through the world, sustaining their affiliations, and drawing in the partiality, unfairness, and dangers they continue standing up to. WCIP addressed more than 60,000,000 Indigenous people the world over. In the second film, the government left its people to die of hunger and cold too. Moreover, in both films, the narrators are children who survived the ordeals that their parents put them through. They explain how their parents died while sacrificing and taking care of them because of so much love that they had. The content of the films is, therefore, almost similar.
Besides, the message of the films is justice to all indigenous people and government intervention to problems facing them. The red power movement in the fist film advocates for people's rights and encourages them to speak up when they have issues that they are facing ( Webb, 2019). The two films are, therefore, a great touch of history and cultural anthropology, which is very educative to the current generation. Another similarity is that women have been used to represent the victims of starvation and the burden of discrimination by the government.
The imagery used in the production of both films is old and black and white. The first film has images from 1975, which are not visible due to the inferior technology used at that time. The narrators in the first film are excellent in their languages. However, there is difficulty in communication between the interviewees and the interviewers in the second film due to language barriers. Kikkik, for instance, spoke in her native language, and hence her words had to be translated to English for proper communication at the court.
Topics of racial discrimination, settler colonialization, and aboriginal injustices have been adhered to in the films. The issue of government negligence to the native people of North America, as depicted in the course, is clear in both films. Understanding who the indigenous people are also helped to know what themes were used in the movie. The knowledge of the Indigenous legal orders and law in Canada also facilitated the identification of what law and order were violated in court, as shown in the second film ( 2020).
Overly, the two films 'Kikkik' and 'Let's walk together as one' is a give an exceptional understanding of the indigenous people's history. The themes depicted in the films include, fight for justice of the native people of Latin America, the Canadian government failed to solve issues associated with starvation, murder, and deaths of the native population. A council formed by Daniel was a representative of minority groups hence advocated for fairness in the jobs market, education, and ownership of land.
References
Napoleon, V. (2007). Thinking About Indigenous Legal Orders http://www.fngovernance.org/ncfng_research/val_napoleon.pdf
Ares - Logon. (2020). Retrieved from: https://reserves.library.carleton.ca/ares//ares.dll?Action=10&Type=10&Value=276860 3)
Ares - Logon. (2020). Retrieved from: https://reserves.library.carleton.ca/ares//ares.dll?Action=10&Type=10&Value=276863
Bals, M., Turi, A. L., Skre, I., & Kvernmo, S. (2010). Internalization symptoms, perceived discrimination, and ethnic identity in indigenous Sami and non-Sami youth in Arctic Norway. Ethnicity & Health , 15 (2), 165-179.
Currie, C. L., Wild, T. C., Schopflocher, D. P., Laing, L., & Veugelers, P. (2012). Racial discrimination experienced by Aboriginal university students in Canada. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry , 57 (10), 617-625.
Kottak, C. P. (2015). Cultural anthropology: Appreciating cultural diversity . McGraw-Hill Education.
Off campus login to access MacOdrum Library e-resources. (2020). Retrieved 20 March 2020, from https://www-tandfonline com.proxy.library.carleton.ca/doi/full/10.1080/14623520601056240
Smith, A. (2012). Indigeneity, settler colonialism, white supremacy. Racial formation in the twenty-first century , 66 .
Snelgrove, C., Dhamoon, R. K., & Corntassel, J. (2014). Unsettling settler colonialism: The discourse and politics of settlers, and solidarity with Indigenous nations. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society , 3 (2).
Webb, D. (2019). Let’s Walk Together as One [Film].
