Based on my response on the economic advantages of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), I still agree with the position that they are beneficial. The UAS combine increased flexibility, reduced costs of operation, and minimal capital allowing them to transform different fields, including farming, urban infrastructure, and oil and gas sectors among other fields. In this sense, utilizing the UAS in future might serve as a more accountable tactic to particular airspace activities from ecological, environmental, and human threat perspectives. Today’s UASs have increased operational duration and need reduced maintenance efforts while at the same time being fuel efficient. Maintaining the UASs is considerable easy while manufacturing them needs technical skills that equal to college degree meaning that they will avail increased job opportunities to individuals venturing into this market. Their price is just a fraction of the manned aircrafts, including crop dusters or helicopters while they do not pose any safety risks. The costs of operating them is also considerably low thus minimizing budgets on agencies and bodily harm that might result when operating in dangerous and risk situations. It therefore becomes possible to understand the cost-benefit ratios attributed to operating UASs (Office of Inspector General, 2014) . In addition to the employment opportunities that UASs offer, the new jobs generated would offer increased economic advantages, such as through the extra money spend locally, which leads to increased demand that results to more jobs, such as barbers, grocery clerks, homebuilders, and schoolteachers among others.
Regarding the benefits of utilizing Predators for border security, they outweigh the limitations. For instance, using the Predators makes it possible to target border threats without sacrificing soldiers, ground efforts, or even civilians hence a distinct vision of border security. The Predators foster increased precision in that their long range can make it possible to identify threats from distant locations and address them effectively. On the limitations, the Predators are not capable of eradicating threats to the U.S. border mostly because numerous networks serve as the reasons for the increased threats to the security of the country as opposed to leaders of extremist movements. Predators are also counterproductive and destabilizing, which creates a need for focusing on the long-term objectives, such as allowing leaders of countries to have control and contribute to the growing threats by extremist forces (Office of Inspector General, 2014) . In this vein, drones have proved beneficial in controlling the borders of the country, although more investment is needed to ensure that they have the capacity of identifying the form of threat posed and the ideal means of coping with it before it gets out of hand.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Based on what I know so far concerning UASs, I would regard the Predator as an ideal system for U.S. border security, which would resemble a virtual wall. They have the capacity of flying for missions for around 20 hours at speeds of approximately 275mph, which exceeds surveillance over various remote parts of the United States. Nine drones have the capacity of flying several thousand hours yearly. This means that adding more Predators and extra financing for flight hours would utilize the overall potential of the machinery in securing the border. Predators provide Border Patrol with the opportunity for concentrating resources, such as recording videos, which are possible to compare with prior flights with terrain changes thus signaling traffic cross-border. It would then be possible to dispatch agents who would follow the emergent trails by installing new sensors thereby closing gaps in security (Buss, 2017) . Areas without traffic would be ignored saving security agencies valuable resource and time.
Other than the Predator, the other UAS that I would recommend is one that would be significantly small to carry in a truck and simple in a manner that Border Patrol would be able to deploy almost instantly (Brandom, 2017) . It should also feature complex sensors, including facial recognition capabilities and infrared cameras for improved surveillance.
References
Brandom, R. (2017). The US Border Patrol is trying to build face-reading drones. Retrieved from https://www.theverge.com/2017/4/6/15208820/customs-border-patrol-drone-facial-recognition-silicon-valley-dhs
Buss, J. (2017). Why drones could be a better solution than a wall on the US-Mexico border. Retrieved from http://ktar.com/story/1503779/why-drones-better-solution-wall-us-mexico-border/
Office of Inspector General. (2014). U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s unmanned aircraft system program does not achieve intended results or recognize all costs of operations. Retrieved from https://www.oig.dhs.gov/assets/Mgmt/2015/OIG_15-17_Dec14.pdf
