It is always expected that there are considered moral and highly accepted practices in some societies, while they are condemned in others—for instance, genocide, polygamy, sexism, and torture. According to ethical relativism, morality is a concept that is relative to one's culture. Whether an action is right or wrong is highly dependent on the norms of that specific society ( DeVito, 2019). The excerpt draws discussions that question whether such moral standards should be relative or be absolute.
The desert concept argues from the perspective of self-interest and rightful interest. According to the illustration, everyone's interest or welfare should be counted, yet everyone's welfare is positively and Absolute Good. The concept dismisses the utilitarian's argument that everyone's claim should be considered. Punishment is administered to the wrongdoer through its against his relative welfare though it's an extension of most people's relative good in society. Punishing people is wrong, yet it is essential to achieve a greater good for the community to prevent lesser harm, hence a necessary evil.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The other concern is rights, where people are concerned about distributive justice in modern times. Either oral rights or legal rights always guide human beings. It is important to note that when it comes to rights, everyone has a right. For instance, one may have a right not to be stolen, yet the thief also thinks they have a right to steal under normal conditions. It evidences that the existence of a right is what forms strict obligation and a commitment that may be rightfully be guaranteed by force. Therefore, society's rights override individual rights and moral standards and absolute to everyone in the community, person, or group. A person's right must not course harm to the majority of society.
Reference
DeVito, J. A. (2019). The interpersonal communication book. Instructor , 1 , 18.
