Different cultures express varying moral codes, and what could be right for one person might be wrong for the other. Philosophers, such as Protagoras, hold that knowledge depends on individual perceptions (McDonald & Svensson, 2010). For instance, when one supports and abortion and the other rebukes it, they are both right. One argument may cite that it is wrong to kill while the other may argue that abortion is appropriate to save the mother’s life. However, some acts are ever wrong from an objective point of view. For instance, killing an innocent person or mugging an old woman is morally wrong at all times, regardless of cultural background. As a result, while some things are wrong according to one’s knowledge, others are intrinsically wrong.
On the other hand, it is not right for everyone to choose which behavior is correct and which one is right. As mentioned above, some people may hold different values, which gives different views on a subject (Cottone & Claus, 2000). Nevertheless, there are good and bad behaviors that cannot change. Such behavior does not depend on circumstances or mitigating situations. People’s minds are distorted by pain and pleasure, and the search for moral behavior is a struggle to get beyond physical perception. Therefore, people should always act according to defined moral codes and avoid immoral acts.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Different perspectives on moral and ethical practices impact the judicial process of decision making. Particularly, the challenge lies in attempting to establish moral and ethical intent and behavior (McDonald & Svensson, 459). The competing moral and ethical values could result in a biased decision. For instance, a pro fessional decision-maker may end up with a decision based only on the held social values but neglects individual rights and social justice. That said, the concept of moral and ethical relativism can impact professional decision-making.
References
Cottone, R. R., & Claus, R. E. (2000). Ethical decision‐making models: A review of the literature. Journal of Counseling & Development , 78 (3), 275-283.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2000.tb01908.x
McDonald, G., & Svensson, G. (2010). Ethical relativism vs absolutism: research implications. European Business Review . https://doi.org/ 10.1108/09555341011056203
