Introduction
In an attempt to improve communication and networking among individuals, smartphone manufacturing companies have created different brands that serve similar purposes but differ in application. However, finding the best phone is still a challenge due to the various companies competing in the production of smartphones. Companies like Apple, Blackberry and Sumsung have taken the lead in this business to provide the best services to their customers.
The features and specifications of the different phone brands like performance, storage, display, long lasting batteries, apps, cameras, sensors, model, and much more determine its usability and preference. The use that an individual requires to use the phone for determines which brand they pick. Brands that contain the best of the features provides the best service to the users.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
To pick a given brand as the most feasible for this project, the smartphones including iPhone 7, Samsung S7 Edge, Passport 4G Cell Phone , Galaxy S8 and BlackBerry KEY one were analyzed following the specifications and features ( Yeager, 2011). The Samsung Galaxy S8 phone proved better than the rest; thus is commended for further analysis since it may suit all needs of the users.
1.1 Purpose and Overview of Report Organization
The purpose of this study was to find out the feasibility and reliability of smartphone brands to assist in daily communication and networking among people in the best way possible. The also, this study intended to determine the validity of the brands to show which smartphone can best serve the needs of the phone users.
1.2 Background of Problem
Today, technological advancements have taken over the communications and networking field in which the type of gadgets matter if there is to be effective services. There are several companies involved in the manufacture of communication devices, especially phones in different brands. The main issue here is finding a brand that is feasible, reliable and valid following the needs of the users. Therefore, this study was done to establish the particular brands that can be recommended to give quality services to the people.
2.0 Assessment of Options
2.1 Solutions and Alternatives
2.1.1 Samsung S7 Edge.
The Samsung S7 Edge is a very beautiful device that has high performance in terms of internet connections, apps, camera, storage, and more features that make it appealing to communication needs. It is fast and can store between 32 to 200GB which makes it reliable and good for usage. This device is easy to use since it can do both video and audio recording and calling. It costs around 56,900.
2.1.2 Galaxy S8.
The Galaxy S8 is a Sumsung product as well that is a result of improvements in the S7 meaning it is much more than the latter. It has high performance, excellent display touch screen, has a storage of between 64 to 265GB of data and information ( In Kondo, In Kada & In Takahashi, 2015). Its cameras are superb as compared to other smartphones, which makes it lead in serving the networking purposes. Most people interested in fast and clear communications would definitely run for this and its cost is 64,900.
2.1.3 BlackBerry KEY one.
BlackBerry KEY one is a smartphone brand that is largely used and it has good performance, display apps, and a storage of 32GB. Its camera can enable taking good pictures, though not like the earlier mentioned. Generally, it is a good one and its price is fair.
2.2 Establishing Criteria
A SWOT analysis was made to compare the different smartphones, which led the researcher to the Samsung S7 Edge, Galaxy S8 and BlackBerry KEY one . The method of analyzing the strengths of each phone brand helped identifying how significant and reliable that particular phone is to achieving the goal of effective communication through looking at maintaining these strengths.
Identifying the weaknesses made the researcher find out which phone has the weak ends that can be easily overcome to qualify it as better than the rest. For instance the study looked at the weaknesses of the Galaxy S8 against those of the iPhone 7 to see which ones can be done away with ( Mind Commerce, 2012). It was a good method as it brought out the different shortcomings of the phones more clearly.
Finding out the threats and opportunities that underlie the use and application of the different smartphones was another section of the criteria in which comparisons were made. The researcher found out that with some phones, there are several opportunities that t creates which can be utilized to maximize achievement of outcomes. Also, the phones with the greatest threats that are not easy to overcome were to be left out as they would seem not feasible.
2.3 Evaluation
The Samsung S7 Edge was looked at in terms of the SWOT analysis whereby it had 90% strength and opportunities like high performance, excellent display options, connect to internet, wifi, and other network connection, with a relatively lasting battery and can perform all communication tasks faster and better. However, the cost was slightly higher than that of other products like the Blackberry KEY One phone. Otherwise, it was found to be a good connection gadget.
The Galaxy S8 is another alternative that was chosen since from the Swot analysis, it showed that it was of high quality through performance, speeds, connectivity, display options, apps and more communication aspects taken care of. It has a long lasting battery, waterproof housing and has big storage space which makes it even better. Although, the prices of this brand are higher than the rest. The price was not seen as a big threat following the quality of the product.
Lastly, the BlackBerry KEY one smartphone was the third option taken as its features are great in regard to the goal and projected outcomes of the device chosen. The SWOT analysis proved that it has good performance for normal phone transactions, display, apps, connectivity and more ( Lu, 2012). Most of all, its prices were slightly lower than its competitor handsets, which make it more attractive. However, as compared to the Galaxy S8 and S7, its performance was not as good which meant it may not deliver the excellent service as projected.
3.0 Recommendations and Conclusion
The organization may have to consider taking on the Samsung Galaxy S8 because it applies to all communication needs. It is waterproof, meaning no matter the weather or condition, it will still perform as expected. Additionally, the phone’s storage is too large that it can aid in storing of information in the organization while easing information sharing through the internet. However, the product requires good amounts of money for the initial purchase. The organization needs to have up to 64,900 for the purchase of each handset ( Yeager, 2011).
3.1 Plan for Implementation
The organization should consider making orders of the number of devices needed for the organization since this will make it cheaper for them. The financial controller and the human resource manager are the bet responsible persons for the purchase since they better understand the communication needs of the organization ( Yeager, 2011). The organization should consider purchase of these smartphones due to the world going digital meaning the organization needs to be ahead of the rest.
3.2 Conclusion
It would be prudent if the entity settled on the best choice that would not only serve to meet the efficiency callings of the entity but also ensure sustainability is the order of the day in the company. In this case, the organization would have to settle on the Samsung Galaxy S8 since it meets all its communication needs. Besides, the organization can revel from its waterproof nature; thus, withstanding whichever weather condition. The storage space should also be put into consideration.
References
In Kondo, K., In Kada, M., & In Takahashi, K. (2015). Three dimensional integration of semiconductors: Processing, materials, and applications .
Lu, Z. (2012). Learning with mobile technologies, handheld devices, and smart phones: Innovative methods . Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Mind Commerce. (2012). Smartphones: New user paradigms and behaviors . Place of publication not identified: Author.
Radwan, A. (2016). Energy efficient smart phones for 5g networks . Place of publication not identified: Springer International Pu.
Yeager, H. L. (2011). Microprocessor power management and a stand-alone benchmarking application for Android based platforms . Austin, Tex.: University of Texas.
