The core value I would be willing to defend by risking my life would be personal freedom. From my childhood, I believe that every human being deserves the right to explore his or her abilities as long as he/she does not go against the existing legal system. This right involves the freedom to make personal decisions without relying on another person's opinion (Calvillo et al., 2019) . One can decide the place he/she wants to live, the actions to take and the wealth to make to serve a personal need. Having such freedom denied means that a person will need the opinion and decisions of another person to take a certain action concerning his/her life. In turn, an individual sometimes will only make decisions that deny him/her the deserved happiness as it is done to serve the interests of another party or party. I make most of my choices to improve myself and have a happy life. Therefore, denying me the freedom to choose my ideals will, in turn, deny me happiness, thus the need to fight for it even if it means risking my life.
The nation going to war would be an appropriate response in certain circumstances. The first scenario that would result in such a decision would be to fight for sovereignty. A sovereign nation can make major decisions on its own without relying on external influence. Such decisions are in line with the interests of its citizens, thus becoming a major component of existence (Powell, 2017) . Having the sovereignty taken will make a country not decide on major issues which serve the interests of its citizens. Such a nation will act as an extension of another which will make it technically non-existence. Naturally, every being will take certain actions meant to overcome certain life-threatening obstacles and ensure its survival. Likewise, a country denied sovereignty would go to war to stand on its own and serve the interests of its people.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
References
Calvillo, D., Swan, A., & Rutchick, A. (2019). Ideological belief bias with political syllogisms. Thinking & Reasoning , 26 (2), 291-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2019.1688188
Powell, G. (2017). Ideological Congruence: Illusion or Imperfection?. Legislative Studies Quarterly , 43 (1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12177
