A. The capability to perform legal searches is varied in various agencies. The police officer’s way of conducting a legal search differs from the way a probation officer could conduct as well as a correctional officer. For a police officer to perform permissible searches, the officer should have a search warrant from the judge that permits him to conduct the victim’s property. This is dependent on the Fourth Amendment. However, there are some exceptions that a police officer may conduct a search without a search warrant. One of the exceptions is when the victim looks suspicious, understandable view search, search after a lawful arrest, and when there is a probable cause (Fagin, 2018).
On the other hand, probation officers have no right to search for other people except the individuals who are serving a suspended sentence. However, the probation officer does not require a search warrant to perform the search (Fagin, 2018). A correctional officer has all the rights to perform a lawful search on prisoners, their cells, and their properties. Like the probation officers, they are not permitted to search other people other than the prisoners.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The three agencies work hand in hand to ensure a criminal goes through the entry, penalty, and exit phase of the criminal justice system. An instance of interagency collaboration is where a police officer partners up with a probation officer to execute a lawful search on a parolee. It helps the police officer when investigating a crime where the parolee is involved.
B. When an investigation is being conducted where an incarcerated prisoner is involved, a law enforcement officer is required to collaborate with the correctional officer or the correctional facility staff. An officer would want to know the visitors of the prisoners with their conversations; therefore, the correctional facility staff is the best option to work with. It is because the correctional facility staff records the prisoner’s phone calls and visitation. Moreover, the police officer can obtain the inmate’s email from the correctional officers however in most cases a court order is required.
C. A presentence report of the convicted is required by the courts when preceding a criminal sentence. The best person to conduct this report is the probation officer, either the state probation officer or the federal state officer (Fagin, 2018). To fully complete the full history report of the convicted, the officer in charge of probation may collaborate with the police officer and the courts. The enquiry of the history report by the probation officer impacts interagency cooperation since the three arms of the criminal justice system, i.e. the courts, correction and police officers work together to complete and give full information of the convicted life history.
D. In 1976 the United States Supreme Court handled a case of Gamble against Estelle, the warden, and chief prison officer. He sued them for inadequate health treatment and punishing him for declining to labor when unfit medically (Rold, 2008). Gamble was hurt when working in the prison’s farm and did not get the right medical care as he was supposed to. The court’s judgment favored Gamble, and after the case, the prisoners have a constitutional right to medical care ruled by the court. Three fundamental rights emerged, which comprise of the right to a specialized care judgment, right to an orderly care and the right to access care, (Nowotny, 2016). Therefore the new decisions by the court had a significant impact on the facilities and improved them (Rold, 2008). Correctional facility medical professionals have more active roles in the health decisions of the prisoners.
E. The career journey that is most matches my collaboration and communication practices is within the courts. I would conclude that I am a fact-based person; therefore, making decisions out of all the pieces of evidence provided is what I like to do. Moreover, I am usually interested in facts and making final decisions after all legal searches have been carried out and evidence provided. Therefore, having an opportunity to work with the courts as a probation officer is the best career path that matches my collaboration and communication practices.
References
Fagin, J. A. (2018). CJ2017. Pearson.
Nowotny K. M. (2016). Social Factors Related to the Utilization of Health Care Among Prison Inmates. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 22 (2), 129-138
Rold W. J. (2008). Thirty years after Estelle v. gamble: A legal retrospective. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 14 (1). doi: 10.1177/1078345807309616.
