The Battle of Little Bighorns took place on June 25, 1876, near the Black Hills in Montana becoming one of the most controversial types of battle in the 20th Century. Gen. George Armstrong Custer was commanding 366 men of the seventh U.S Calvary during that day of the war (Potts, 1994). A medicine man known as Sitting Bull was leading 2000 braves of the Lakota, Northern Cheyenne, and Arapaho tribes (Fowler, 2002). After the conclusion of the battle, the stories concerning the Indians savagery was in use to demonize their culture, and interestingly there was no survivor from the seventh Calvary to tell the people what took place. Before the war in 1875, Custer had managed to strike a commitment with to the Sioux or Lakota that they will longer fight the Native Americans.
The promise of Custer seems to work when there was a meeting involving the U.S commission and Lakota in the effort to purchase the gold mining fields in the black hills that Custer had managed to discover one year ago. Lakota was not happy with the Senate's decision they reject the offer in favor of observing 1868 treaty that promises to protect their lands. The government manages to use Custer to remove the natives living in the Northern plains against the agreement that was in place (Manzione, 1991).
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The article manages to focus mainly on the battle near Black Hill where the two groups were fighting over the land resources. There was also treaty in place that would help the two warring communities in settling their disputes concerning the gold mining fields. In the article, it shows that the use policies cannot be sufficient to make things work effectively because it is evident that in the story, the government could go against the treaty by using one of the groups to remove the natives. The decision of the government seems to incite the two groups to fight because the foreigners cannot have the power to displace the natives from their land even with the backup of the treaty that ensures that the Native Americans have their rights to live in their places.
After the war researchers had to document the event systematically to enable them to get a clear understanding of what conspired during the battle. The available technology after the war that was helpful in unraveling things involves the use of topographic research, time motions basing it on the feasible speeds and documentation of intersections. The smart way of piecing up the events could allow the researchers to connect what took place on the battlefield. The social climate after the war was a mixture of celebration on the side of Lakota but on the side of the seventh Calvary was mourning because of the loss of the entire army. The brave men of Lakota were rejoicing and celebrating their winning as they move out of the war after killing all of their counterparts in the battle.
The content of the articles is a replica of what exactly it is taking place in the current generation where people are always fighting over resources instead of coming up with strategies that can enable people to utilize the resources sustainably. The researchers of the article manage to do an excellent job since the material is in a position to link the past events with what it is happening in the current society. However, the researches could have also help in explaining farther what was driving the government in encouraging the other group to remove the natives from their motherland. Another thing is that the author could also ensure there are no contradictions in the story through having clear and systematic outcomes.
References
Fowler, L. (2002). Tribal sovereignty and the historical imagination: Cheyenne-Arapaho politics. U of Nebraska Press.
Manzione, J. (1991). I am looking to the North for my life"--Sitting Bull, 1876-1881. University of Utah Press.
Potts, J. B. (1994). General Custer and the Little Bighorn reconsidered-Archaeological Perspectives on the Battle of Little Bighorn by Douglas D. Scott, Richard A. Fox Jr, Melissa A. Conner and Dick Harmon/Cavalier in Buckskin by Robert M. Utley/and others (Book Review). The Journal of Military History, 58(2) , 305.
