Part I
Generic rehabilitation programs are based on the characteristics of people requiring intervention. As observed by Hector and Khey (2018), generic rehabilitation programs are more effective than general rehabilitation as they target the specific needs of the criminals or patients. However, currently, there are only broad categories applied to the generic rehabilitation process. In the future, these programs could be adapted to meet the specific needs of every patient or criminal. The diversified groups using these programs belong to other smaller factions that can negatively or positively impact their recovery. These groups include but not limited to gender, mental health, age, race, personality, and nature and magnitude of the crime. Adapting the generic rehabilitation programs would have assorted benefits to both the patients/criminals and the rehabilitating institutions.
Firstly, the adaptation of generic rehabilitation would increase the quality of data collected. Spiropoulos, Van Voorhis and Salisbury (2018) argue that data collected during the rehabilitation process is useful in planning and implementing future treatment plans. However, in most cases, the data is not case-specific making it less applicable in the broad spectrum. For instance, offering rehabilitation to offenders who are mentally unstable could invalidate the findings composed during the rehabilitation process if the program fails to put into account the mental condition of the patient.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Secondly, the adaptation of these programs would increase faster and higher recovery rate for the patients. The process would ensure that a patient receives tailor-made intervention as opposed to general intervention or interventions based on larger groups. The specificity of the rehabilitation program, which aims to meet the needs of a specific patient, would increase the overall efficiency through effective communication between the patient and doctors as well as feedback. Similarly, the approach would case-specific information allowing the institutions to recommend the future of treatment for a specific patient. For instance, a male sex offender might have different crime triggers that a woman sex offender. The design of advanced intervention for the two patients must consider their specific cases, and specifically the triggers to come up with a valid treatment program.
Part II
Yes, there is a need for gender-specific programming in the rehabilitation center. Men and women have different cognitive mapping derived from their different social roles, the perception of the self, and the socialization process. As the rehabilitation programs seek to reach out to the addicts and change their inclinations to some tendencies, they must consider the nature of the patients or criminals to achieve success (Sung, Sánchez, Kuo, Wang & Leahy, 2015). Using gender-specific programs would increase the recovery rate as the solutions proposed are tailored to specific personality traits derived from one’s gender.
Moreover, adopting gender-specific programming in the rehabilitation center would allow the subjects of the programs to speak out and engage with each other without the gender barrier. For instance, it is unlikely that a male sex offender would understand or even sympathize with a male sex offender. However, a male sex offender might understand the crime triggers that led a fellow male offender to commit the crime. When allowed to socialize, subjects of the rehabilitation process belonging to the same gender are likely to understand their challenges from both personal and social perceptions thus increasing the possibility of quick recovery. Summarily, gender-specific rehabilitation programs create a favorable social and psychological environment for both the institution’s staff and the patients. Such friendly environments are necessary for positive general positive impact and support for the patients.
References
Hector, J., & Khey, D. (2018). Treatment: Intersection with Criminal Justice. In Criminal Justice and Mental Health (pp. 75-104). Springer, Cham.
Spiropoulos, G. V., Van Voorhis, P., & Salisbury, E. J. (2018). Programmatic Moderators of
CBT Correctional Treatment for Whites and African Americans. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology , 62 (8), 2236-2258.
Sung, C., Sánchez, J., Kuo, H. J., Wang, C. C., & Leahy, M. J. (2015). Gender differences in vocational rehabilitation service predictors of successful competitive employment for transition-aged individuals with autism. Journal of autism and developmental disorders , 45 (10), 3204-3218.
