#Chapter 7. Group dynamic is usually the force that binds organizations. It promotes orderly functionality and demands for specific codes of conduct and ethics. Working in a group tends to display individuals strengths and weaknesses. Most writers have argued that it is not always an easy task since people’s beliefs and perception of ethics vary. In the day-to-day life, individuals face the mission of making value judgment that may establish if their choices lie within the ethical boundaries. However, it should be noted that groups do not jointly come up with ethical decisions. According to Holloman (1991), the composition of groups in an organization promotes individual vale judgment; hence, ethical decision-making will be based on this factor.
The major ethical dilemma posing a challenge to my group is the issue of excessive control. This represents itself in form of power dynamics. Deeper understanding of the inequities and differences among members sometimes lack undermining the group performance level. When there is no clear comprehension on the functionality of group protocol, both members and leaders may bring damages despite their good intentions. Leaders who have excessive control over the group members create and breed resentment and conflict among the group members (Holloman, 1991). In relation to this, some members within the group are from dominant factions in the society hence, they exercise unnecessary control over the others. It may display itself in times of assigning responsibilities as well as dictating strategies to be followed.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
According to Mintz (2015), excessive controls by the group leaders or members in a group can be managed through various ways. First, the facilitators or the group leaders may need to understand the personality traits of each individual and the suitable roles for them. Psychologists have managed to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of individuals when it comes to appropriate tasks. Therefore, for effective group performance, leaders and individuals in a group should learn the capabilities of the other members as this would avoid power dynamics. When people in a group appreciate the role of each other and respect individuals ethics, there will be successful decision-making and the levels of inferiority complex within the group will reduce (Mintz, 2015).
#Chapter 8. Out of the ethical challenges of leadership and followership described in this chapter, the one that I have found to be difficult to meet is the issue of power. Being a good leader who can exercise power over opinionated individuals can be a challenging task (Holloman, 1991). In any group setting, you will always find out that people display different opinions. As a leader, one is faced by the task of choosing the appropriate decision in the end. Most times, the members might question your authority. Such an example of conflict in a group tests the power of a leader. Additionally, it will determine the members relate with them. Usually, the final decision will be liked or disliked by some members. Amidst all this, group leaders should not lose their power to please the members. An authority figure is very significant in a group (Holloman, 1991).
Group leadership is an unending process. Some of the factors that can help a leader overcome the challenges of power include having good communication, good value judgment, vision, and strategy. These four factors are critical in maintaining the functionality of a group.
References
Holloman, R. (1991). Improving our Ethical Climate. Part One'. Industrial Management (July/August , 115-121.)
Mintz, S. (2015, 10 29). Workplace Ethics Advice. Retrieved 12 8, 2015, from Accounting Ethical Dilemmas: http://www.workplaceethicsadvice.com/accounting-ethical-dilemmas/
