Risk Analysis of Fight against Terrorism
From a risk analysis viewpoint, it is reasonable from a cost point of view to spend billions of dollars in an effort to stop a “hand-full of people" who can pose terror to the United States. The billions of dollars spent on finding terrorism can be justified from a moral and economic perspective. From a moral viewpoint, it is the responsibility of the government to protect its citizens at all costs. There is no cost that can be attached to human life; therefore, the billions of dollars spent on suppressing terrorism ensure that an invaluable asset is kept safe; that is human lives. From an financial viewpoint, the economic effect of terrorism on the U.S, along with the international market since the terror attacks of 9/11 was significant, and it took several years for the economy to recover from the attacks. Therefore, it is rational to spend billions of dollars to protect the country from potential threats that can lead to great loss and ruin the socioeconomic welfare of citizens.
Hardened Border Paradox and Closed Border Paradox
The hardened border paradox describes a physical reinforcement of the border by deploying security patrols, constructing fences, and watch towers in the effort to stop the migration of illegal migrants, which leads to the opposite effective. The ultimate objective of hardening is to stop the illegal trade that goes on within the border region. The paradox occurs since this hardening has the opposite effect from the original intention since it leads to more crime, misery, and death ( Ashby, 2014) . On the other hand, the open border paradox describes the complete opposite. It articulates that when there are less stringent measures, there will be less crime but the influx of migrants to the point that it can become unsustainable ( Blake, 2019) . The two paradoxes can be surpassed by using a rational compromise that includes physical restrictions and the application of reasonable, open, and safe guidelines for legal commerce. Such would not be detrimental to the legitimate movement of people across the border that leads to profitable ventures.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
References
Ashby, P. (2014). Solving the border paradox? Border security, economic integration and the mérida initiative. Global Society , 28 (4), 483-508.
Blake, G. H. (2019). 15 Globalisation and the Paradox of Enduring National Boundaries. Vanishing Borders: The New International Order of the 21st Century .
