The excellence of health care is a paramount aspect of universal care focused on improving outcomes, care experiences and reducing costs through improvements. The pay-for-performance initiative is one important healthcare quality initiative that aims at ensuring patients’ care is guaranteed by offering financial incentives to hospitals, physicians, medical groups as well as varied healthcare providers once they meet certain key performance measures. The quality healthcare initiative model in addition to offering incentives, they penalize care providers in cases of medical errors, poor outcomes and increased costs.
The pay-for-performance initiatives have in the healthcare sector brought immeasurable bundles of benefits with a reduced clinical practice variation. Since many programs in the initiatives are founded on evidence-based medicine, healthcare providers are left with no option other than following established clinical practice guidelines.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Additionally, the medical practitioners have been indicated to reduce errors given that the healthcare quality incentives offer penalties for medical errors. Consequently, patients’ safety has been enhanced reducing hospital-acquired illnesses, readmissions and technical errors. To enhance healthcare, health providers have ensured appropriate care settings which are cost saving allowing hospitals to utilise limited resources (Temple, Thompson, & Khan, 2016).
Important characteristics of screening
An important aspect of medical care is screening which can take varied forms from lab tests, simple questionnaires and other procedures. Studies by Hepner and National Defense Research Institute (U.S.) (2016), have revealed that the importance of screening is to detect diseases even before symptoms can appear with the aim of providing early treatment. Good screening is characterised by a criterion that serves as the measure for assessing quality.
To begin with, the condition for which screening is being undertaken needs to be a crucial health problem. The fact that the condition has to be an important health condition helps reduce instances of medical or technical errors. According to Temple et al., (2016) reducing medical and technical errors is an important aspect of reducing costs and an integral quality initiative.
Another criterion that should be employed by private and community health providers for the quality measure is doing screens for ailments that have an accepted treatment once the ailment is recognised. It is worth noting that using the accepted treatment criterion ensures that patients’ safety is guaranteed subsequently reducing chances of hospital-acquired illnesses.
Additionally, healthcare providers should have available facilities for diagnosing and treating diseases that are found after screening. A suitable test should exist to ensure safe examination considering its acceptability among the population (Das, Ashis, Gopalan, Saji, Chandramohan, & Daniel, 2016). The set criteria are aimed at ensuring the quality of care provided to patients.
Quality measure in the Presbyterian Hospital-New York
The Presbyterian Hospital has been ranked as one of the best hospitals in America. In light of the need to ensure the quality of healthcare provided, most care providers have defined their niche in the quest for quality health provision.
First, according to the World Health Organization criteria for ensuring quality, screening for possible diseases should be carefully undertaken. The New York-Presbyterian Hospital has established facilities that are among the best in the United States. The availability of facilities ensures that right medical care is accorded to patients. Additionally, the facility has a broad range of services for which the hospital offers that are provided by qualified medical staff. Maintaining a team of qualified medical staff, helps New York-Presbyterian Hospital to keep off possible medical and technical errors thereby ensuring quality healthcare provision for clients.
References
Das, Ashis, Gopalan, Saji, Chandramohan, & Daniel. (2016). Effect of pay for performance to improve quality of maternal and child care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review . (BioMed Central Ltd.) BioMed Central Ltd.
Hepner, K. A., & National Defense Research Institute (U.S.). (2016). Quality of care for PTSD and depression in the Military Health System: Phase I report .
Temple, N. J., Thompson, A., & Khan, A. (2016). Excessive Medical Spending: Facing the Challenge . Milton: CRC Press.
