Identify the first step in the student’s guide to research
The first step to undertaking a research is identification of the subject matter of the research with precision to the extent that the operating definition can be observed and measured.
Define the first step of research in your own words
The first step towards research involves an in-depth analysis of the subject matter of the research. Such analysis involves a comprehensive and elaborate determination of the major concepts in the research and to what extent they can be quantified. This enables one to assess the scope of the research, hence the depth of the concept that will be covered in the research.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Major assumptions and bias of the drug industry that underlie drug research
The bias of the drug maker towards the research is founded on the nature of fiscal connections between the company and the study itself. First, this is manifested when the trial had been financed by Glaxo Smith Kline, the drug maker, while all the eleven authors received money from the company. In addition, four of the authors were employed and had stock in the company, while the other seven were academic experts who had received grants or consultant fees from the company.
Despite presenting the report generated from the research as certain, in terms of accuracy of evidence, GlaxoSmithKline’s evaluation was made on various assumptions. First, the drug maker assumes that the international study pointing out that Avandia is more effective than other standard companies. Again, the fact that the company is affiliated to the authors, the layman reader may not notice the fact that there might be some bias.
Personal bias that, as a consumer, have on the drug industry’s influence over research
Based on the facts, from a personal opinion, the Avandia drug not absolute and certain as it is presented through the company’s study. In addition, having employees and stockholders to be part of the research and involving experts who had initially benefitted from the company, also shakes the integrity of the product research. Presumptions made that the consumers may not be versed with these ties are risky and irresponsible of the company. It is quite possible that some influence was exerted to alter outcomes and make them favorable towards the funding company. Nevertheless, if third party researchers were contracted as a larger part of the research team, credibility would have been higher.
References
Whoriskey, P. (2012). As Drug Industry’s Influence Over Research Grows, So Does the Potential for Bias . Retrieved from Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/as-drug-industrys-influence-over-research-grows-so-does-the-potential-for-bias/2012/11/24
