Food insecurity and hunger are a product of armed conflict, poverty, and other hindrance that may block people from accessing food. Food insecurity was defined as deficiency of consistent access to sufficient food for a healthy life by the U.S sector of agriculture. Preceding the change of the present consistent amount of domestic diet uncertainty in 1995, approximations of the lack of food access varied extensively. There was a slight compromise over which degree was most precise. In Contrasting to many developing nations with extensive long-lasting food insecurity due to hunger, food insecurity, and universal food scarcity in the United States happen in terrestrial of ample food (Riches et al.2014). While some people experience hunger at times of the year as they don't afford enough food, only a small portion of the population experiences food insecurity.
A healthy and productive community is one that has sufficient food and free from disease. It is believed that the health of an individual is deeply connected to hunger. Food insecurity is linked to adverse effects on overall health, where people with chronic diseases are required to take a sensitive diet. According to Riches (2014), In a school set up, the American phycological association confirmed that students who have sufficient food perform better than those who suffer from hunger when it comes to development and academic achievement.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The best advocacy to use is charity-policy advocacy through the media campaign. This is a combination of donations by individuals or groups and government assistance (Riches et al .2014). We can consider hunger as an inherently political issue that requires political effort to solve the problem. People become hungry as a collective choice made by us. Charity will have a positive impact since those who are hungry will be fed and have the energy to work for themselves, improving the economy. With hunger reduced, the crime rate also decreases, benefiting society. If society does not receive education at the right time, they might end up interpreting the issue negatively. Some people may conclude the food donated is either sold or given to lazybones or even used to fund illegal groups or terrorists. Thus, it is essential to clearly explain where the food is taken and why—economic factors such as affordable housing, high medical cost, chronic illness, and low wages. Considering the social setting determines the food choice. The availability of healthy food means that there are consumption and donation of healthy food. Access to healthy food options is limited in many working environments. Like for example, you cannot donate port to a place occupied by the Muslim religion. Poverty and deprivation are positively related to sexual ill-health.
Society can help eliminate hunger and food insecurity by sharing food with those without and donating to organizations serving the hungry. The community can also engage in farming, which will produce surplus food shared with the needy and the homeless. Before implementing charity-policy advocacy, some ethical consideration is put into account. Exploitive labor practices, damage to the environment, and inhuman treatment of food animals are considered ethical.
The new advocacy was used some time back in the 1980s; the president put some efforts on food assistance, which led to increased programs and projects to alleviate the condition. With the president-elect's changing after elections, the measures reduce as the president-elect may not focus on the outgoing president's strategy. F AO endorses and classifies high-level actions to grow alertness and create chances for relationship and agenda-setting on social safety.
References
Tarasuk, V., Dachner, N., & Loopstra, R. (2014). Food banks, welfare, and food insecurity in Canada. British Food Journal .
Riches, G., & Tarasuk, V. (2014). Canada: Thirty years of food charity and public policy neglect. In First world hunger revisited (pp. 42-56). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
