It is usual for individuals to trust that the primary difference between modern and ancient democracy is that the latter is representative, while the former was direct (which explains the minimalist notion of representative and direct democracy). The impression that democracy should or does converge on a sensibly identifiable greater good finds its locus classicus in Aristotle’s political theory. Particularly in his argument that decision processes should disclose a general will that embodies a greater good (Frank, 2005). Aristotle’s definition of political success is the overall happiness of citizenry. This is due to his belief that politics and ethics are related closely. Aristotle shares the view that molding great character in people is the first and most significant approach towards solidifying the satisfaction of the state as a whole. In context, for any democratic administration to survive, it ought to deliver sufficient justice as supposed by its citizens (Arlen, 2016).
Aristotle states in a way, which predates the modern classification of powers that three elements exist in every constitution. The first part is deliberative, which includes decision-making concerning the most important political issues, including the scrutiny and election of public officials, legislation, forming alliances, making peace, condemning to death, waging war, and confiscating property. The second element relates to the duties, function, and jurisdiction magistrates including different ways that they can be elected. The third is the application of judicial power (Frank, 2005).
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Modernization manifests itself significantly by changing social conditions, which foster a democratic culture. Aristotle writes that revolutions primarily happen due to factional conflicts including those between the poor and the rich (Frank, 2005). He refers explicitly to democracy and oligarchy since this is where he believes it factional disputes between the poor and the rich occurs (Arlen, 2016).
ReferencesTop of Form
Arlen, G. (2016). Aristotle and the problem of oligarchic harm: Insights for democracy. European Journal Of Political Theory . http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1474885116663837
Bottom of Form
Frank, J. (2005). A democracy of distinction: Aristotle and the work of politics . Chicago, Ill: The University of Chicago Press.
