The criminal corrective system isolates lawbreakers from free association and becomes incorporated into an inmate subculture. Two viewpoints can explain the occurrence of inmate subculture. The first model is the deprivation framework, which states that inmates become part of the culture because of the distress associated with imprisonment. The importation model is another framework that describes inmate subcultures. In this concept, subcultures are not regarded as distinctive but a manifestation of felonious factions outside the prison. The inmate subculture is the reason behind the regulations, rules, and undertakings in the prison environment.
Consequently, these factors accomplish one main purpose control inmate behavior (Thistlethwaite and Wooldredge, 2010). Once in prison, inmates are deprived of their individuality hence forced to recreate a new one. Their new behavior can either be in line with prison regulations or rebel against the guidelines.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Inmate subculture is the result of convicts’ behavior. The use of punishments and rewards in the corrective system is to control this behavior. Punishments adopted in prisons include the hole, privilege loss, and increase in sentence. On the other hand, the use of rewards is based on grading good behavior among inmates. Convicts earn good grades by staying out of trouble and following the rules. The inmate subculture also generates routines like, for instance, waking up at 5:30 a.m. and sleeping at 9:00 p.m. (Thistlethwaite and Wooldredge, 2010). Meals were also provided three times as a standard.
Additionally, bathing and dressing are scheduled just like all other activities in prison. Prison “counts” are another important part of the prison environment. Inmate subcultures are usually associated with hostility, physical injuries, and conflicts regulated through stringent measures and rules. These features are the main characteristics of most prison environments
Reference
Thistlethwaite, A. B., & Wooldredge, J. (2010). Forty studies that changed criminal justice . Prentice Hall.
