1. Describe communication barriers that can occur within an interdisciplinary team .
Perceptual barriers occur when a member of a different department considers that the other person will not understand or be interested in the information that will be conveyed (Fewster-Thuente & Velsor-Friedrich, 2008). The latter concerns a situation when the sender of the message already perceives that the receiver is to green for the message that is being communicated. As such, this will limit communication prospects. Additionally, communication in the interdisciplinary team can be hindered if the sender sums up that the receiver is not interested. This biased opinion affects communication in the sense that it might be untrue that the other party is no concerned about what will be communicated.
Poor feedback in the healthcare setting affects the effectiveness of communication (Fewster-Thuente & Velsor-Friedrich, 2008). This evident whereby the receiver can send the wrong message as they have perceived or understood it. It is a reaction, and without it, the sender might not understand what is being communicated. Thus, poor feedback affects the ability of interdisciplinary team working in a mutually exclusive manner.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Language barriers affect the communication prospects of people from different departments (Fewster-Thuente & Velsor-Friedrich, 2008). In essence, the language barrier is inherent while there are those that the parties engaged in communication are not aware of. That being said, the use of jargon words in communication will be problematic to the other party as they are not aware of what is being communicated to the other person. The use of technical words will render the communication ineffective as there will be no reception of what is being said; as such there will be no reply. Conversely, the receiver might give the wring feedback as they would not have understood anything. This will affect positive health outcomes of patients in the hospital.
2. Explain how communication barriers between members of an interdisciplinary team can affect patient safety and healthcare outcomes.
Communication barriers can affect the chances of a person being aware of health conditions and services. People are who not affluent in the official communication languages can be at risk of determining the available services and being in a position of making an appointment in the hospital. Notably, many of telephone, print, or internet sources are available in the selected region's language (John ‐ Baptiste et al., 2004). Thus, people who cannot the prospective language will suffer from lack of accessing pertinent services. Language barriers also affect the ability to access ambient health information. For example, lack of English proficiency has been linked with lack of stroke and heart attack knowledge.
Patients with language barrier tend to suffer from the not accessing regular medical providers (John ‐ Baptiste et al., 2004). This happens even in a region where universal care coverage has been met by the government to eliminate that barrier that once existed in health care. For example, French-speaking minorities in the United States might not be in a good position of finding family doctors, whether immigrant or non-immigrant.
People with limited English proficiency are highly likely not to be in apposition of receiving recommended health care (John ‐ Baptiste et al., 2004). The language barrier has been linked with fewer vests for medical problems by people who can communicate in the officially recognized language. Non- English-speaking mothers are also not likely to receive pertussis vaccination before pregnancy. Moreover, patients can be in no position of accessing forms of supplementary or alternate health care services.
3 . Recommend evidence-based strategies to improve communication within an interdisciplinary team.
Staff from different departments should share a language (Reader et al., 2007). Sharing language refers to the staff being aware that the party is or might not be conversant with jargons stemming from the respective discipline. This can be achieved through education and enlightening to avoid communication discrepancies. Alternatively, the other party should also be in a position of clarifying what is not understood to ensure better service delivery (Reader et al., 2007). Moreover, health professionals from different disciplines should accept different perspectives from parties they are communicating with. This is because different fields have distinct concepts and what might be apparent in line might mean differently on the other end. Although the differences might be apparent, the key is for the professionals to acknowledge rather than assume that they are not on the same line of thinking. In the end, one party will be acknowledging what they know and what they do not know; this is amidst the fact that there is no time for the person to recognize with the peer’s work intimately.
4. Explain how specific communication strategies benefit both team members and patients.
Sharing language is important as it helps in diagnostic accuracy (Reader et al., 2007). This, in the end, will improve the diagnostic accuracy and positive health outcomes for the patient. Markedly, there are several departments in the hospital, including the doctors, nurses, nurses, clinicians, pharmacist, but to name few. For this reason, sharing knowledge will help prevent the missteps that might occur during communication. This will improve the synergy amongst the workers and in the end, lead to better health outcomes.
Adherence is highlighted when the members of the different departments acknowledge what they do not know with the barrier realm (Reader et al., 2007). The synergy emanating from this concept is important as it leads to staff and patient satisfaction. Particularly, this can be seen when the health team members explain to each other the meanings of their jargon words and in the end proactive approach to diagnosis and positive patient health outcome.
References
Fewster-Thuente, L., & Velsor-Friedrich, B. (2008). Interdisciplinary collaboration for healthcare professionals. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 40-48.
John ‐ Baptiste, A., et al. (2004). The Effect of English Language Proficiency on Length of Stay and In ‐ hospital Mortality. Journal of general internal medicine, 19(3), 221-228.
Reader, T. W., Flin, R., Mearns, K., & Cuthbertson, B. H. (2007). Interdisciplinary communication in the intensive care unit. British journal of anaesthesia, 98(3), 347-352.
