Q1
Studies are usually replicated after publication, which leaves room for research to become famous before verification. Occasionally, some experimentations contain errors and inaccurate information that need to be verified to establish if the findings are false or not. However, institutions or individuals have to utilize the same sample sizes, hypotheses, and variables, which is an expensive and time-consuming process. Ideally, for unethical researchers, it is easier for them to use undefined variables and fake results that get the media attention to secure their jobs and other work opportunities. Conducting experimentation is a source of income faced with demands from institutions to publish articles that result in revenue and media focus. Gebelholf (2016) agrees that scientists also have to deal with numerous pressures and still publish experimentations that can attract media attention. The gap between replication and publication of investigations makes it possible for research to be famous even when errors and misinformation are present.
Also, conducting research and reporting is a source of employment, influencing studies to get more media coverage without verification. When scientists and the media do not work together to ensure reports are up to standards, examinations promote individual careers than public welfare. Media sources report mostly on what people want to know and give attention to controversial investigations that attract viewership. For instance, fact-finding on sexual matters can alleviate attention to findings to influence audiences and create traffic to websites. Blackstone (2012) outlines that headlines are geared towards piquing readers' interests to influence readability drive. Indeed, boosting studies' circulation by eliminating errors in media reports grants institutions the opportunity to benefit from flawed experimentations. Exaggerating certain studies or manipulating them creates a buzz that draws viewership even when the study is not verified.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Q2
Consequently, unverified popular research leads to poor quality investigations that are inapplicable and cannot be replicated. Flawed studies create problems for the public and the professionals who want to practice in different fields such as science and sociology. As Blackstone (2012) suggests, examinations are conducted to solve social problems that shape how society functions. For instance, provide information on human behavior, drug effectiveness, and disease causes. However, Errors and lack of verification means that studies become unreliable or useful. Through investigations, phenomenal relationships between variables are identified, ensuring that individuals can apply findings personally and professionally. Ideally, if the public and professionals rely on flawed studies, they can apply incorrect findings to crucial life decisions.
Manipulation to present favorable results leads to elusive p-values. Statistical significance is demonstrated through p-value, which requires testing of a null hypothesis. It is vital to establish the impact of a hypothesized causal influence for experimental design. However, Adam (2017) suggests that replication relies on the same research questions, variables, sample size, and hypothesis similar to the first study. However, self-desired results do not follow any specified protocol to report significant results. As a result, trying to prove facts using manipulated hypothesis and p-value leads to conflicting results that do not demonstrate variations of a similar data set.
References
Adam Ruins Everything: (2017). Why Flawed Studies Get Famous. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Phxht9U2yZk
Blackstone.A. (2012). Principles of Sociological Inquiry: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. " Why should we care ?" Boston, MA: FlatWorld
Gebelholf, R. (2016). Why Flawed Studies Get Famous https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/in-theory/wp/2016/08/17/the-media-is-ruining-science/
