The Kantian duty-based ethics also referred to as the deontological ethics, explains Ponzi and Daniel's scenario. The term "deontology" is derived from the word "duty" to emphasize that the ethics under this system are specifically directed to behaviors and actions done while on duty. The deontology theory states that individuals have no choice but to act according to laws, guidelines, or regulations that govern them, regardless of the outcome of their actions (Seven Pillars Institute, 2013). By introducing the concept of "outcome," Kantian emphasized actions or behaviors that bring positive results but are immoral or contravene the law. He sought to exclude such actions from what was permissible with other systems, such as the utility theory that emphasizes happiness and pleasure to justify actions and behaviors. In the scenario, Ponzi takes a bribe and ends Daniels’ diversionary contract prematurely. The action leaves Ponzi and Daniels happy. Also, it does not cause any harm to other parties. This behavior would be acceptable under the utility theory because it leads to pleasure and good in the involved individuals. On the contrary, the deontology theory disregards the outcome and looks at bribing as a contravention of the law, thus unethical. Also, the actions take place while Ponzi is on his duties, which perfectly fits this duty-based theory.
Consequences
Ponzi’s misconduct is an act of bribery that may lead to the termination of his services. Ponzi may face a suspension from duty for a specified time with a reduced remuneration in case of a lenient punishment. The third option is a reassignment, where Ponzi may be taken away from the current duties for different responsibilities at a different location (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2017, p. 77). These actions depend on the circumstances that led to the misconduct and Ponzi’s past ethical behaviors.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Recommendations
Organizations should establish independent intelligence units to gather information on ethical misconduct. The intelligence units should be given resources and adequate protection to execute their duties and provide reports with recommendations to the administration. The administration should then set measures to eliminate the identified unethical conduct through disciplinary sanctions. Organizations should also support community correction personnel and solve work-related challenges that contribute to ethical misconduct.
References
Seven Pillars Institute. (2013, January 29). Kantian duty-based (Deontological) ethics. Retrieved from https://sevenpillarsinstitute.org/kantian-duty-based-deontological-ethics/
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2017). Handbook on Anti-Corruption Measures in Prisons . Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/documents/justice-and-prison-reform/17-06140_HB_anti-corr_prisons_eBook.pdf
