Narcotta-Welp, E. M. (2016). “The future of football is feminine": a critical cultural history of the US women's national soccer team.
This source primarily talks about a crucial cultural history of the U.S. Women’s national soccer team by focusing on its cultural and historical construction. It is because the academic and the public discourse linking constitution the U.S. women soccer are often consistently linking the game with the Title IX feminist legislation, in addition to positioning male coaches as benevolent patriarchs who are known for granting young women and ladies the right to play. This source is very significant, particularly for the scholars who are interested in knowing more about the cultural history of the U.S. women national soccer team. As a result, this would assist in confronting the historical narrative of women’s soccer through the cultural frame of post-feminist, neoliberal, sexual politics, as well as post-racial. In my research paper I would utilize this source for examining how media in addition to other corporations are cultivating the U.S. women national soccer team and its individual stars.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Steinmetz, G. (Ed.). (2018). State/culture: State-formation after the cultural turn . Cornell University Press.
This source talks about the history of the U.S. state formation with regards to the ongoing “cultural turn” within the social sciences. It observes that the cultural turn constitutes a wide variety of new theoretical impulses emanating from fields that were previously unimportant to the social sciences, in addition to submerged traditions within these social sciences themselves. Importantly, this source observes that the cultural turn is more general as compared to the more recent decades’ poststructuralist movement. This source is of more significance since it helps in understanding how the cultural turn within social sciences is involved with more general allegation of the constitutive responsibility of culture. As a result, the source seems to be self-directed against the still-powerful paradigms of social sciences that are presenting subjectivity and meaning as causally or epiphenomenal unimportant. In future research, I would consider using this source to determine how objectivism treat the American culture as determined by non-cultural or material factors that are regarded more basic.
Spring, J. (2016). Deculturalization and the struggle for equality: A brief history of the education of dominated cultures in the United States . Routledge.
This article mainly discusses the history of Anglo-Saxon concepts of culture superiority during the 1517 Protestant Reformation period. It argues that the English people in the U.S. during that particular time and the nineteenth century made it known that the English protestant culture was more superior as compared to other countries, such as Spain, Italy, and Ireland. The development of the U.S. public schools during the nineteenth century sparked cultural tensions between the Catholics and the Protestants. This source is of great importance since it can help in tracing and understanding the cultural superiority of the English people in the U.S. As a result, this would significantly help in understanding why the Irish were considered inferior savages by the English people, and the only way they could be redeemed is by adopting the English culture. In future, I believe that I would utilize this source to research how both the English and the Irish culture helped to form the American culture.
DiMaggio, P., Sotoudeh, R., Goldberg, A., & Shepherd, H. (2018). Culture out of attitudes: Relationality, population heterogeneity and attitudes toward science and religion in the US. Poetics , 68 , 31-51.
This source primarily talks about the culture of attitudes by discussing the population heterogeneity, attitudes, as well as relationality towards religion and science within the United States. It observes that attitude data can assist in revealing the secrets of the U.S. culture, but only if research analysts are capable of acknowledging in addition to transcending two problematic types of heterogeneity. This source plays a significant role since it utilizes the Relational Class Analysis and the Latent Class Analysis for analysis. As a result, this helps in examining the attitudes of the U.S. people towards religion and science during the late 20 th century, during the beginning of acute cultural contention between the secular liberals and religious conservatives. In future, I can utilize this source to research how different cultural opinions among the religious Americans have essential implications for both science advocacy and science policy.
References
DiMaggio, P., Sotoudeh, R., Goldberg, A., & Shepherd, H. (2018). Culture out of attitudes: Relationality, population heterogeneity and attitudes toward science and religion in the US. Poetics , 68 , 31-51.
Narcotta-Welp, E. M. (2016). “The future of football is feminine": a critical cultural history of the US women's national soccer team.
Spring, J. (2016). Deculturalization and the struggle for equality: A brief history of the education of dominated cultures in the United States . Routledge.
Steinmetz, G. (Ed.). (2018). State/culture: State-formation after the cultural turn . Cornell University Press.
