Over the years, the world has witnessed the rise and fall of leaders from the medieval times to the present regimes. While each of these leaders portrayed remarkable leadership and unique skills, it is intriguing that some of them are greatly respected as compared to others. The common misapprehension held is that successful leadership is dependent on the use of authority. However, the vast swath of history left behind proves the presumption to be fallacious. The notion of leadership has undergone a revolution as experts discover new paradigms on a daily basis. A coercive authority may yield results but considering the moral dimension of leadership would indubitably be more rewarding.
The unprecedented pace in which the world is moving in has seen leaders face new challenges regularly. The debate, however, is not whether the world needs leadership but rather what to integrate into the related subject to attaining remarkable out-turn (Lawton & Rayner, 2016). Leaders have various roles including creating a vision, inspiring trust, executing plans, and transforming the lives of their followers. From my point of view, I would prefer the accommodating role which impacts the lives of people through coaching their potential. Individuals who have historically made their way to the upper echelons of leadership used result-oriented approaches (Blake & Mouton, 1964). Blind and unfruitful loyalty can only last for so long. To fully comprehend the human needs with management, I prefer the Maslow theory of needs. The hierarchy of needs explains that the fulfillment of one want will cause a desire to achieve the next level of needs (Miner, 2015). Although human beings are assumed to have all their needs partially met, the theory explains why people so ambitious in nature.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
In the corporate world, management systems apply their influences not only to obtain results but also to do their bidding. The rationale elaborates on why the once exemplary image of leadership is presently tainted. Ethics and management are compatible (Torales, Rodriguez, & Bhugra, 2013). Nonetheless, as times advance, corrosion has gradually depleted morality in leadership. Ethical management is not only beneficial to the owners but also other as well. Managers face different dilemmas which mandate sound and fair judgment to arrive at amicable solutions. One of the most effective measures that can aid in restoring morality in leadership is through rewarding ethical conducts (Blake & Mouton, 1964). The shareholders could implement incentives to encourage managers to act virtuously within and without the organization.
My networking skills are relatively proficient. What I do not focus on the simple factors but instead strategies that deliver positive outcomes. I am an eloquent speaker who regards other individual’s opinions. I welcome criticism because I am of the presumption that growth can be attained by positively assimilating censure. Consequently, I have identified my shortcomings such as spending much time on the internet which has significantly hindered my socialization skills. I plan to use the different social platforms to network instead of idling around.
In conclusion, leadership forms an essential part of people’s livelihoods. Nevertheless, proper management is beneficial while poor leadership possesses detrimental consequences to the society. The different roles assumed by managers determine the future relationship between the leaders and their followers. An accommodating leader is most likely to maintain a stature that lives on even after their retirement or demise. Maslow’s motivation theory attempts to elucidate the ambitious nature of man to consummate the five basic needs. The Hierarchy theory emphasizes the relevance of ethics in management. Leadership exercised without ethical values inevitably invites failure.
References
Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). Managerial Grid Model - Also Known As Leadership Grid. Retrieved August 26, 2018, from https://www.leadership-central.com/managerial-grid.html
Lawton, A., & Rayner, J. (2016). Managerial Functions in the Public Sector. Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance , 1-6.
Miner, J. B. (2015). Organizational behavior 1: Essential theories of motivation and leadership (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Torales, J. B., Rodriguez, H., & Bhugra, D. (2013). Leadership, Ethics and Managing Diversity. Leadership in Psychiatry , 233-237.
