The aphorism the might makes right is a notion the persons who have power and ability have the last say especially on contentious issues. Naturally, the people tend to use muscle and financial power to push their agendas and achieve their desired goals. People who believe in such notions would do all they can to have interests of their nations pushed beyond everybody else's. It does not matter what happens along the process, the damages caused, they only look at the ultimate interest they have. Mostly, might makes right is used in international politics. Today, the United States employs the might makes right belief when engaging other nations, especially those thought to be dangerous to humanity.
International relations take ugly turns at times, especially when the two nations do not come to a common conclusion. The US uses drones for a number of purposes, mostly as military unmanned vehicles for missions thought to be too dangerous for man. The have been used to collect critical information about governments and groups that are considered as dangerous their citizens. The aggression shown by the use of the devices is unwarranted as it breaches privacy and is considered an intrusion. Still use the drones in areas where they are not allowed, in different countries that have expressed concerns about the same. However, most of these nations do not have the financial and firepower to stand against the US on their own. In some instances, they are dependent on the US and would not put up a significant opposition.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The US uses such aggressive means knowing that the target nations or sections of the nations are unable to object the actions actively. Though at times they are forced to withdraw the drones from the place, in most cases, they get the information they want for use in future military operations. The drones attract spirited criticism for nations that feel that the sovereignty of others is infringed. They too talk from the comfort of their seats at home that the US will reconsider their actions and withdraw. Nations rarely confront the problem head on, giving the US the right to make such decisions. They are able to go about their business in a different area not because it is legal, but because only a few refuse such aggressive moves. The reluctance of other nations from actively engaging the US is based on the fact that the US is a superpower; wealthy, has sophisticated weapons, and highly trained military personnel. They are forced to technically accept the aggressive drones because they can't simply win a war or any other engagement.
Use of drones into other nations' territories is a breach of the other nation sovereignty. The fact that the drones are used for security missions also makes them, even more, security risks for the target nations. Although they have been used for the good at times, lack of agreement among nations ensues more often whenever they are used. It is important for such aggressive behavior to be moderated to help stop entry into countries and access of information breaches the security protocol that the target nation has put in place. They can't, however, say not in totality because they either need the US or risk getting tagged as terrorist sympathizers. The might makes right notion is spread through such actions, a nation directly and actively breaches the others privacy and sovereignty but the other cannot refuse because they have far less ability to do so. In the end, the aggressive nations acquire technical rights to control other nations because of their finances, markets, weapons, etc .
