The North Atlantic Treaty Organization has been over-engaged in a series of efforts to develop effective mechanisms and strategies that will go a long way in keeping the safety of its operational scope. The NATO efforts have been emboldened by the rise in the cases of terror attacks that have targeted its capital and other places of work. At the same time, NATO has had to keep to the spirit of increasing its security awareness and strictness at the least cost possible ( Johnson, LaBenz & Driver, 2013) . The Smart defense seeks to promote multinational approaches to capabilities and to set right priorities by engaging on the interoperability of the NATO capabilities.
The stand s the United States in the use of the Smart defense approach is the same. The resolve to support the Smart defense by the USA has been founded on the realization for less costly security systems in the wake of the Libya crisis. According to Mizera & Macko (2013), the smart defense approach includes the state of the global economy and the stability of the dollar in the market. The USA has been on record as applying budget restrictions on the effect of controlling the spending on security systems. The smart defense, therefore, seeks to engage partners, led by Germany in the development of technologies that will help in the monitoring of borders, and enemy actions ( Johnson, LaBenz & Driver, 2013) . The enhancements of US-controlled satellites have improved the detection of dangerous operations in some countries like the nuclear mission in Iraq.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
NATO’s approach to smart defense has met several challenges. There have been cases of conflict of interest. Such a case where the US has had a disagreement with Canada over the border has only served to slow down the pace of progress. The difference over territorial controls is also a challenge ( Mizera & Macko, 2013) . For instance, the decision by the USA to withdraw its troops from Afghanistan was prompted by the massive push from the European NATO members, France and Spain ( Urbelis, 2013) . However, the one agreement that the NATO has focused on is the improvement of the Smart defense as the surest way of increasing efficiency and stability.
References
Johnson, P., LaBenz, T., & Driver, D. (2013). Smart Defense: Brave New Approach or Déjà vu?. Naval war college review , 66 (3), 38.
Mizera, M., & Macko, P. (2013). NATO Forces 2020: Role of connected forces initiative. Policy Papers , 6 .
Urbelis, V. (2013). The implication of the Smart Defence Initiative for Small Members of NATO. Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review , 11 (1), 9-27.
