Understanding of the complex issues of nuclear proliferation and terrorism requires denunciation of the dominant dogmas on their causes. The proliferation in nuclear is usually linked to the technological need for renewable energy, while terrorism is often perceived as psychosocial problem. However, critics of the existing dogmas advocate for a paradigm shift towards a more quantifiable approach in defining the phenomena. The most prominent approach relates to understanding of the phenomena as acts of political strategy. Under the circumstances, nuclear proliferation and terrorism are defined as rational acts that follow logical processes that are identifiable and explicable.
To understand the rational conceptualization of the phenomena of nuclear proliferation and terrorism, it is imperative to explore related incidents to develop a general view of the motives driving individuals’ behaviors. For instance, the US has been in long-standing diplomatic spats with North Korea and Iran over their perceived proliferation in nuclear. While North Korea is steadfast in its assertions that its nuclear programs seek to ensure global and regional balance in terms of military and nuclear power, Iran appears evasive, citing its nuclear projects to be solely for technological advancement.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The US and other leading economies in Europe prioritize the foreign and security policy founded on nuclear disarmament, the non-proliferation of nuclear programs, and eventually a world free of nuclear weapons capable of mass destruction. The view held by advocates of non-nuclear proliferation is that a generalized abandonment and condemnation of such programs is the most promising approach to halting the proliferation in nuclear. International support for the project towards a world free of weapons of mass destruction is informed by the potential for nuclear terrorism. Global peace advocates recognized and acknowledged the real threat of nuclear materials at the hands of terrorists in the turn of the 21 st century.
The US administration has consistently recognized and raised concerns about the real prospects of terror groups such as Al Qaeda to acquire nuclear weapons. The determination to buy or steal such weapons, and the perceived willingness to use them is a major security threat to the world. The proliferation in nuclear is synonymous with the rise in nuclear terrorism because it increases the avenues and dealers through which terrorists can acquire materials they can use to develop weapons of mass destruction. Therefore, the nuclear disarmament process seeks to seal all loopholes through which acquisition, transfer, leakage, or theft of nuclear materials from legitimate producers to terrorists may occur. Possession of such weapons by terrorists is often viewed as an act of commission or negligence by the state. Consequently, states form the primary targets in the non-proliferation and disarmament processes.
Concerns emerge when exploring the proliferation in nuclear and terrorism in the context of the logical paradigm of politically motivated strategies. The association of nuclear programs with weapons of mass destruction presents opportunists with contrary political ideologies, with the potential to perpetrate violence and destruction of unimaginable scale. The relationship between terrorism and politics is perilous in instances where an unstable government is in possession of nuclear programs with the potential to develop weapons of mass destruction. In other words, toppling of the ruling government by insurgents may give them access to such nuclear programs. The possibility of these nuclear programs to be used to disrupt the search for perpetual peace is very likely. Extremist organizations attach a high level of usefulness to terrorism. Terror allows them to masquerade their true intentions, which in most cases, are political.
Therefore, the new approach in understanding the phenomena of the proliferation in nuclear and terrorism is critical in identifying possible links between the two. Terrorism causes devastation, and its potential to be used to advance political interests or express dissent, needs to be managed through the adoption of preemptive measures. Through a logical explanation of the phenomena, it is possible to identify and prevent possible integration of terror and nuclear programs, hence, ensuring tranquility between countries and globally.
